All Forum Comments
Comment by beginner posted on An unusual man at 14/12/2010 - 21:39
For image quality...No2
Comment by beginner posted on What is it - Macro Night at 12/12/2010 - 10:28
I'm with Barrie on this one!...Mine crashed after 8 years of use,I just went to my local computer shop in Hexham.He asked me what I used it for,I told him ,and he built me one!......3 days and it was ready.The good thing was he downloaded everything off the old one onto the new!....If I have any problems it's just a short trip into town to get it fixed!.....
Comment by beginner posted on tower or laptop? at 11/12/2010 - 18:57
Clarky wrote:
I just picked up my K5 yesterday and the first 6 shots I took were testing at f22 on a sheet of glossy photo paper, with the 35mm macro ltd. I wanted to see if the problem was there initially, It isn't!! Serial no, 3913....
But that doesn't mean it won't appear after some use,
I am about to update the firmware and then check it again, but I doubt that will have anything to do with it, just covering all bases.
The South bound K5's must be alright then!...I just picked up my K5 yesterday and the first 6 shots I took were testing at f22 on a sheet of glossy photo paper, with the 35mm macro ltd. I wanted to see if the problem was there initially, It isn't!! Serial no, 3913....
But that doesn't mean it won't appear after some use,
I am about to update the firmware and then check it again, but I doubt that will have anything to do with it, just covering all bases.
Comment by beginner posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 11/12/2010 - 18:44
Have you formatted the card in your camera?
When I put my card through the pc card reader then place back in my K20 it shows "Card full!"....even though it's not,I re formatt the card in camera and everything is fine!....be worth a go!
When I put my card through the pc card reader then place back in my K20 it shows "Card full!"....even though it's not,I re formatt the card in camera and everything is fine!....be worth a go!
Comment by beginner posted on image cannot be displayed at 10/12/2010 - 16:12
Dr. Mhuni wrote:
It's your screen (again:lol, Tim! I can see loads of detail. However, the bad news, Alun, is that I can see a lot of noise too. The DJ and curtain behind are very noisy in the first - on my screen. In the second it's not so serious but it is there. Faces look good, though - especially in the second (and no, that's not just an indication of my preference for young girls - though I can't discount this entirely:wink.
Re. the shadow detail - a similar thing happened with Tim on another forum. I spotted something in a photo which the original poster couldn't see (it was in shadow). Tim couldn't see it either. Others came along, of whom some could and some couldn't see it.
Edit: Just seen your post Alun. So you can't see it either. Which means it's probably my screen that needs calibrating.
"Same on mine!....enough to make you Deaf!"It's your screen (again:lol, Tim! I can see loads of detail. However, the bad news, Alun, is that I can see a lot of noise too. The DJ and curtain behind are very noisy in the first - on my screen. In the second it's not so serious but it is there. Faces look good, though - especially in the second (and no, that's not just an indication of my preference for young girls - though I can't discount this entirely:wink.
Re. the shadow detail - a similar thing happened with Tim on another forum. I spotted something in a photo which the original poster couldn't see (it was in shadow). Tim couldn't see it either. Others came along, of whom some could and some couldn't see it.
Edit: Just seen your post Alun. So you can't see it either. Which means it's probably my screen that needs calibrating.
Comment by beginner posted on The Village Ball at 10/12/2010 - 12:10
Mike-P wrote:
The difference is quite noticeable on a landscape shot.
Besides, OP is on a limited budget (although he doesn't say how much).
Sorry Mike,I meant bulk/size wise!....beginner wrote:
I wouldn't have thought the difference between the kit lens and the 16/45 would make that much difference!....
Well you have both so why not try it.I wouldn't have thought the difference between the kit lens and the 16/45 would make that much difference!....
The difference is quite noticeable on a landscape shot.
Besides, OP is on a limited budget (although he doesn't say how much).
Comment by beginner posted on What lens? at 08/12/2010 - 21:36
I wouldn't have thought the difference between the kit lens and the 16/45 would make that much difference!....
Comment by beginner posted on What lens? at 08/12/2010 - 18:26
Wait till it dries then "Butterfly "it!.......I've never had any joy with wet cleaning either!
Comment by beginner posted on K5 Sensor Issues... at 08/12/2010 - 18:23
Was he a Pentax user?