Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
stu49 wrote:
Anvh wrote:
stu49 wrote:
I assume I need a Dedicated flash ?? AF 360FGZ or AF 540FGZ ?
Here is a good guide for you link
I was looking at this earlier, but wasn't sure how much of it applied to the k100. Thanks for that
Not everything such as using the build-in flash to trigger the flash gun wireless but the exceptions are written in the explanations.

Comment by Anvh posted on PTTL-HSS mode at 27/09/2009 - 22:04

Anvh
stu49 wrote:
How is this done ? the camera won't let me set less than 1/180, so how is this acheived ?
To start it only work on the newer Metz guns (except 36 AF-4) and it's a mode on the gun itself.
If you set the gun on HSS it should allow your camera to use faster shutterspeeds, don't know if there is any camera mode restrictions though, don't believe so besides that you can't use it in X-snyc mode and B

Comment by Anvh posted on PTTL-HSS mode at 27/09/2009 - 20:21

Anvh
stu49 wrote:
I assume I need a Dedicated flash ?? AF 360FGZ or AF 540FGZ ?
Here is a good guide for you link

Comment by Anvh posted on PTTL-HSS mode at 27/09/2009 - 20:18

Anvh
stu49 wrote:
Can I assume none of this works on a K100 ???
(must buy that K10 !!)
Sorry to disappoint you but it also works on the K100D I believe, if you have the right flash that is.

It's so far as I know only very useful as filling flash, besides that I don't know any use of it.
If you want to freeze something you're better off using the flash normally instead of using HSS since a single flash freeze the image but with HSS it "strobes" so it won't stop movement.

Comment by Anvh posted on PTTL-HSS mode at 27/09/2009 - 20:00

Anvh
Looking for a potential set-up for a new computer but don't know really what to get at the moment.

It's main use will be photographic editing but also the occasional games and the PC will be running Windows 7 64bit since I'm running the RTM now and it works great.

The two major problems at the moment is what CPU and GPU to get.

CPU will be Intel but which one?
i7 with triple lain, with dual lain or an i5?

GPU is also a hard one.
I'm quite impress with the new ATI cards (RV770-gpu) although somehow Nvidia always seem to be the deal when working with Adobe in terms of compatibility.
Is this true or is their hardly any difference?
I've always liked Nvidia cards but recently they seem to lag a bit behind ATI at the moment and ATI are impressive in terms of games and performance/power consumption so might go for them if there are no drawbacks.

Comment by Anvh posted on Computer, many new things on the market but what to get? at 27/09/2009 - 17:25

Anvh
impotentspider wrote:
Just a thought, but why dont you try extended bracket, setting it to vary the sharpness? then you're only flipping the mirror once and the camera will vary the sharpness, your problem might not be totally down to vibration.
Why not use raw instead?

Comment by Anvh posted on Multiple exposure on K10D at 22/09/2009 - 08:38

Anvh
£5000-£6000 would be a very competitive price, it might press down some of the high-end fullframe DSLR.
Let see if it's true since the price is very low, but it would be a great stunt.

The sensor though will be most likely Kodak so a KAF-31600 31.6 MP CCD sensor link

Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax 645D Release Date at 21/09/2009 - 16:44

Anvh
K10D wrote:
I think we agree?

A 300mm lens on a 35mm is then enlarged by whatever the ratio is, up to 6x7 or there abouts. Do we then say that the 300mm lens is equivalent to 300mm x the ratio? Focal length of a lens is, I believe, fixed. What we do with it's projected image surely cannot alter that?

There has to be a huge difference of course as 35mm is too far off 6x7, where as cropped and 35mm are relatively close

Best regards

Yes it seems we are thinking the same
The focal length is fixed and the projected image stays the same.
The equivalent focal length is only to get the same AOV.
AOV is important because that's relative to the sensor size and how big on object is on final print (or relative to the sensor).

I'm quite against using equivalent focal length since most users have never had a SLR so they have no idea what a 300mm lens does on that, it's better to forget and simply go with your experience.

beakynet wrote:
To be honist, I am not surprised that Pentax don't currently offer any lens beyond 300mm. Until the Pentax K-7, the shutter/mirror noise was too loud for nature photography and the focus too slow for sports.
I can't really agree with that though, how on earth would we have photos of sport 50 years ago while there wasn't any AF to begin with.
And the shutter sound doesn't carry so far to scare the birds away

Pentax probable didn't make a lens longer then 300mm since their would not be so much demand for that. They probable though it was more important to get the 60-250 out and the 200, 300, 17-70, 55, etc. I believe they did the right thing to be honest.
They now have a solid digital lens range so they can now focus on the bit more exotic lenses.

Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax Has No Long Lens at 21/09/2009 - 11:28

Anvh
lemmy wrote:
I don't think that digital photography has led to an overall dilution of photographic work, I do think that it has diffused it.

Technically, today even a novice can turn out good work from day one. One person's work looks much like another's.

It means the one or two per cent of highly talented people shine out like beacons from the mass. The five or ten per cent under that who would once have been notable are now submerged in the noise of the rest.
I don't think we can blame the DSLR for that, I believe internet is to blame here more than anything else.
It's so easy to show your photos now to a public you would never had without the internet.

With digital we have besides the full atuomatic mode (which Lemmy speak off?) also the half automatic modes like AV and TV, have those change on the digital camera?
Besides that with digital the lightroom has come to us, almost no one leaves there photos untouched so we need to learn more about that now to get good results.

I don't think digital have diluted the art of photography but it has changed it though, make it more accessible for some but also harder for some others.

Comment by Anvh posted on dilute photography at 20/09/2009 - 20:49

Anvh
K10D wrote:
FOV is equivalent but not object image size on any sensor for a given distance. I still work on actual lens focal length.

Always an issue topic this one. Nikon have bodies that auto crop for digital only lenses, that does not alter the actual object image on the sensor. True, the object image covers more area of the sensor if cropped size but then you print up to standard sizes and bring in the 1.5x factor.
Quite true but you base your focal length on what they do on 35mm since you're used to that.
What if someone is shooting whit a 6x7 camera, for him a focal length of 90mm is standard and 300mm is nothing special.


a 400mm f/5.6 would be welcome addition to pentax, Don't think we need or will see a exotic 600mm f/4 and such lenses.

@John, the 600mm f/4 is now discontinued, at least it listed there on the Japanese site.
The price is 1,417,500 yen (£9535)

Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax Has No Long Lens at 20/09/2009 - 20:29

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo