All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on OK - so what / who is a Pro ? at 17/12/2009 - 18:07
could the eye's be picking up light from a (window, house bulb ?)
I thought the strobes would cancel this out.
Comment by Anvh posted on Consistent colour with in a studio environment at 17/12/2009 - 16:15
Reversion would be problematic with distance, don't know how good long focal-length + extension tubes is.
Comment by Anvh posted on Macro lens vs extension tubes at 17/12/2009 - 15:22
They buy fullframe screens and cut them down to size.
Katz-eye use the Nikon K3 screens so if you get the standard version there would be little difference between other brands.
Katz-eye have the opti-bright so that makes them different but like you said with that and third rule option you come to an amount of $205.00.
The focusingscreens are $77.35 with rule of third they don't have the opti-bright. Although I think $127 for a coating/treatment is quite a lot but that's for you to decide, it might certainly be worth it.
Also don't forget the tax and shipping you need to pay with both.
Comment by Anvh posted on Split image (between ebay, splitscreen.com and KatZ eye) at 17/12/2009 - 15:19
That way you have control over the colour on your paper regardless the brand or type of paper & inkt.
Yves (pentaxian450) use them so you can ask him more if interested.
Comment by Anvh posted on Compatible Canon ink carts? at 17/12/2009 - 15:06
They need to protect that profession again so that you need to have the right papers to be a photographer. Still it does say nothing about the quality of the photos but at least the paper shows someone has the or needs to have the knowledge and you also make the market smaller, since that's a big problem.
Amateurs who are good at photographing or get a lucky shot are taking away the market for the professional photographer who needs to sell his photos to get food on the table.
Also the harm done by so called professionals who think they are because they have the gear and hire themselves like that isn't pleasant either for the "real" pro's.
I'm not a professional and won't go to lends to call myself that, semi-pro isn't the word either, enthusiastic amateur suits me the most and many of us here.
So I don't have the great understanding of the professional world but I hope I've laid my finger on the problem here.
Comment by Anvh posted on OK - so what / who is a Pro ? at 17/12/2009 - 15:02
A sort of a double focus confirmation
Comment by Anvh posted on Split image (between ebay, splitscreen.com and KatZ eye) at 16/12/2009 - 23:34
Comment by Anvh posted on Split image (between ebay, splitscreen.com and KatZ eye) at 16/12/2009 - 23:28
Comment by Anvh posted on Split image (between ebay, splitscreen.com and KatZ eye) at 16/12/2009 - 23:12


The profession engineer (and technician?) is as far as I know protected so you can not call yourself one if you don't have the qualification.
Of course there are ways to self teach you photography and if done correctly it wouldn't be so hard to do one test right.
All just for protecting the market.