All Forum Comments
No indeed not in camera but you can easily do it in photoshop and also probably in gimp.
Comment by Anvh posted on multiple exposure feature uses?? at 04/01/2010 - 15:05
Thank you for the extra information.
Very strange to be honest, never had a problem like that with my K10D, hopefully someone else can help you more.
adwb said he had also some problems like that but he doesn't know either what cause it.
ps.
Going from Matt, you said handheld so if you've it on spot metering then your light meter can also go up and down quite easily.
Very strange to be honest, never had a problem like that with my K10D, hopefully someone else can help you more.
adwb said he had also some problems like that but he doesn't know either what cause it.
ps.
Going from Matt, you said handheld so if you've it on spot metering then your light meter can also go up and down quite easily.
Comment by Anvh posted on Shutter Speed Differs at 04/01/2010 - 15:01
hefty1 wrote:
Take a three image multiple exposure. In the first shot use a red filter over the lens, a blue filter in the second shot and a green filter in the third. Anything that has remained still during all three shots will appear as normal (a combination of the R, G and B images) whereas items that have moved (clouds are great for this) will take on spooky and surreal colour casts. Takes a bit of trial and error but can give some great results.
Nice effect no need for a filter though , you can simply extract the colour you need since the sensor is built up form red green and blue filters.Take a three image multiple exposure. In the first shot use a red filter over the lens, a blue filter in the second shot and a green filter in the third. Anything that has remained still during all three shots will appear as normal (a combination of the R, G and B images) whereas items that have moved (clouds are great for this) will take on spooky and surreal colour casts. Takes a bit of trial and error but can give some great results.
Comment by Anvh posted on multiple exposure feature uses?? at 04/01/2010 - 14:48
Screen normally has a resolution of around 72ppi, if you're going to print then 300dpi is more then enough, I believe 240 is the more standard there.
Comment by Anvh posted on save for the web at 04/01/2010 - 14:20
Welcome to the forum.
The lens has nothing to do with the shutterspeed all the mechanics and option/functions are in the camera body non are routed through the lens.
You can even set the shutterspeed without a lens attach for example.
here is some info we need.
What shooting mode and what was the shutterspeed, was it on a stable tripod, did light conditions changed (cloud moving before the sun?).
The lens has nothing to do with the shutterspeed all the mechanics and option/functions are in the camera body non are routed through the lens.
You can even set the shutterspeed without a lens attach for example.
here is some info we need.
What shooting mode and what was the shutterspeed, was it on a stable tripod, did light conditions changed (cloud moving before the sun?).
Comment by Anvh posted on Shutter Speed Differs at 04/01/2010 - 14:15
Yeah that's why uploaded this shot as a quicky
Really pushing things there.
ISO 1600
1/25 (panned!)
f/2.8
108mm
This was on the limit and a lot aren't that good, later I simply use a flash to capture them and it worked surprisingly well.
The other Pentaxian used his new K7 so he should have much cleaner shots then I with my K10D.
Really pushing things there.
ISO 1600
1/25 (panned!)
f/2.8
108mm
This was on the limit and a lot aren't that good, later I simply use a flash to capture them and it worked surprisingly well.
The other Pentaxian used his new K7 so he should have much cleaner shots then I with my K10D.
Comment by Anvh posted on Auto race at night at 04/01/2010 - 11:47
Well to my horor i shot 720 photoss, never even knew so many pef files can go on a 8GB card and I still got room to spare, I believe the camera said around the 60 shots.
So please JudithAnn give me some time
Here us a quick photo though.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/_IGP5520.jpg[/IMG]
So please JudithAnn give me some time
Here us a quick photo though.
[IMG]http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk244/Anvh/_IGP5520.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Anvh posted on Auto race at night at 03/01/2010 - 23:20
Paulm I do the same, also don't forget to set embed a sRGB colour space.
I never found 1024 a problem here of course you can do the resizing better but be able to click on the photo and get a larger one is a plus point for me.
A tiny bit of topic but can you make from a photo a link?
You might ask why but it's a perfect compromise between the two.
You've your own resized 800px photo and you can have a link behind that to a larger photo.
I know you can do it with httml and tried it here but can't get it to work
I never found 1024 a problem here of course you can do the resizing better but be able to click on the photo and get a larger one is a plus point for me.
A tiny bit of topic but can you make from a photo a link?
You might ask why but it's a perfect compromise between the two.
You've your own resized 800px photo and you can have a link behind that to a larger photo.
I know you can do it with httml and tried it here but can't get it to work
Comment by Anvh posted on save for the web at 03/01/2010 - 22:48
Well I'm back and it was fun and it lasted two hours longer then expected.
Used a tripod and that worked quite well with lower shutter speeds and later even used a flash which worked great.
Will post some photos when they are ready.
Used a tripod and that worked quite well with lower shutter speeds and later even used a flash which worked great.
Will post some photos when they are ready.
Comment by Anvh posted on Auto race at night at 03/01/2010 - 21:13
There is no size limit any more on this forum, the forum automaticly adjust the size but off course a smaller size loads faster.
1024 on the long side seems to be a good number.
1024 on the long side seems to be a good number.
Comment by Anvh posted on save for the web at 03/01/2010 - 21:12
