All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Bing search, get rid of it!! at 11/03/2010 - 15:53
If the only criteria is that it be aesthetically pleasing then no I don't think it's art. As stated above (several times now!) my opinion is that, in addition to it having no purpose other than being aesthetically pleasing, there must also be skill involved.
The Sydney Opera House is certainly a piece of art but it's also an opera house, or isn't it art?
And what about the photos I show in this topic, those are also made to bring over a message so aren't they art either?
I'm sure all art is made with a second thought besides that it must look pretty.
Comment by Anvh posted on what is art at 11/03/2010 - 15:45
Would like to see the originals as well if you've the time
Comment by Anvh posted on Reprocessed animal photos at 11/03/2010 - 15:41
Comment by Anvh posted on More from sunny(?) Girona at 11/03/2010 - 15:40
I see Stefan has been on one of his 'reply to ancient unanswered posts' journeys again
My grandpa is in the hospital this week an I haven't been able to put my mind at ease so yeah I wander the internet then and I thought I might do something useful then
It's sometime so strange some shots gets no comment at all how good they might be.
There are some other great shots in the past but they member hasn't come online recently so didn't comment on them.
Comment by Anvh posted on Macro 'Arabella' at 11/03/2010 - 15:33
ISO range 25 - 400 ? ? ?
And there are some that use binning to get higher sensitivity with the lost of resolution.
(But would prefer a H4D-40:wink
Comment by Anvh posted on 645D starts a price war at 11/03/2010 - 15:23
something that's made by someone to be aestheticly pleasing.
Since no non commented I thought I was wrong
I agree totally about the skill, and here I'm with you that I'm no art expert. But if it is just skill how do you reconcile a Constable or Tuner with a Munch or Van Gogh
There is of course also talent which Thoramay and the eye for things, that's something hard to train. That's why some artists excel over others and why some are better in math and the other in language.
Comment by Anvh posted on what is art at 11/03/2010 - 15:19
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html
Start up times



now don't say that there isn't a difference
And about render times read the full article, it's more I wont to copy
Here are the winners though in each test.
Category / Test Overall Winner
Startup Times / Opera
Memory Usage / Firefox
Page Load Times / Firefox
HTML / Safari
CSS / Safari
Tables / Safari
JavaScript / Chrome
PeaceKeeper / Opera
Acid3 / Chrome
DOM / Chrome
Flash / Opera
Java / Opera
SilverLight / Firefox - Internet Explorer
The strangest thing is that I ate least don't find Safari to run so pleasantly on my computer, I'm sure it would run nicely on OSX but on windows?
Comment by Anvh posted on Bing search, get rid of it!! at 11/03/2010 - 15:07
Comment by Anvh posted on Macro 'Arabella' at 11/03/2010 - 01:01
The first one is a bit weird, it almost look like the man is a ghost or something
now the second shot is very well done while playing with the lines and adding some contrast with the round ball, very well spotted and taken this shot.
Now the third is the same as the first, a bit weird but I like the faceless faces since when we are we just don't notice them.
Comment by Anvh posted on Some photos from Poland II at 11/03/2010 - 01:01


Thanks, Stefan. Which versions of the browsers were these, does the article specify?
Computer:
Operating System - Windows 7 Ultimate (64-bit)
CPU - AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ @ 2.0 GHz (dual core)
Motherboard - Biostar NF61S-M2 TE
Memory - 4GB DDR2 @ 800 MHz (2 x 2GB)
Graphics - Evga Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB GDDR3), PCI-E 1.0
Storage - Western Digital Caviar WD400, 40GB EIDE, 7,200 RPM
Optical - Asus DVD-RW 1814-BLT-BULK-BG
Power Supply - Corsair TX750W (750W Max)
Apple Safari - 4.04
Google Chrome - 4.0.249.78
Microsoft Internet Explorer - 8
Mozilla FireFox - 3.6
Opera - 10.50
Ahhhhh, that's great for startup times... but I don't start up my browser continuously whilst browsing . Is there a chart for page rendering time?
Also, FF tends to depend on addons/scripts/widgets; mine is slow and crashes or freezes several times a day because of those. Not FF's fault, but it's the only reason I use FF.
Most of the time they run a test/render 5 times and took the average.
But you might leave an question mark with some tests.
They tested a clean install so no addons/scripts/widgets/plug-ins.
besides Silverlight, Flash and Java of course.
Ditto here Nass. I use around 5 plugins with firefox, and my launch times are considerably slower than 4 seconds. And it uses a ton of memory, which makes switching to another app a lot slower when running under heavy load.
Most of the time I simply install Opera when I help someone with their computer it's simply one install and it runs great out of the box most of the time, although I might need to give Chrome a better look, it does seem it's a good browser as well.