They both are, he will probably get a Nikon, Sony or Olympus now

What about this one?
http://www.vimeo.com/11497898

Only one day left

Have two new entries the last few days
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP8132.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/_PRI0710.jpg[/IMG]

Not what you asked but maybe a solution.
Have you looked at the Lowe-pro Inverse?

some reviews, keep in mind that there are 2 sizes.
link
link
link

That take quite some time then

That shouldn't matter.
The SDHC standard is for 4GB, 8GB, 16GB and 32GB cards from the start and the KM has a stamp on it that it can use the SDHC standard so that includes 32GB.
The connection and the interface of SDHC cards are all the same the only thing that's different is the storage size.
Since the standard insure they all use the same connections and language the storage size shouldn't matter because the card and the camera understand each other.

Here are some reviews.
Dryzone link
Primus AW link

I'm looking for a bag myself so that's why
I think I'll go for Crumpler though but those don't feed your need though.

Please show us a photo it would be clearer than what you're talking about.

Yes sorry
Still the KM support SDHC and 32GB is a normal SDHC standard so why wouldn't it work?

For saving and storage I use lightroom.
I don't mind to wait when it upload photos so I use lightroom to compress the RAW files more saving around 10%.

Since most of what I shoot is from family events I don't use a special catalogue I just put everything on date.
I only have the RAW files since when I need to make them to JPG it's only two clicks away and I can adjust the settings to what's needed and I throw the JPG away when I don't need them any more so they aren't stored in the catalogue.
Only photos that get a special treatment in Photoshop I save as PSD and since Lightroom can read those Lightroom automatically grabs the edited file and place it next to the original.

It now sounds like you should process the 200 RAW files one by one but if the settings and lighting is constant like you seem to suggest you only need to process 1 RAW file.
You can then copy those settings to all the other RAW files, it's called batch processing and can be very efficient when you've a lot of the same photos.