All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Lens based autofocus inconsistencies at 08/09/2010 - 13:21
Comment by Anvh posted on Voting Competition #2 - The Votes at 08/09/2010 - 13:15
The FA43 is not as sharp lens wide open either but for the rest I don't really know, I haven't really looked at enough photos from that lens to judge it.
This just a feeling though but I've the idea that FA lenses worked better on film than on digital, do you think that's true?
It's just that those lenses are never made to be used on digital and they are missing some optimization. I wonder if there is a service that can coat the rear element to improve them on digital?
Aren't all lenses designed for optimal overall preformance?
I don't know what you mean with absolute measurements though
If you don't get what that means, don't worry. It wrecks my head too. But it is reassuring to know that I have not been imagining the differences between my FA43 and FA77 and other lenses I have used.
But field curvature is only one aspect of a lens so how can you call that overall performance? Also so far as I know only Macro lenses are designed to have a very flat field and i don't see why it's important with normal lens besides very fast ones or at least why it is more important than correcting other aberrations.
Just a note but I believe having a flat field curvature or little astigmatism is the same thing or are at least closely related.
And meridional plane are you sure about that, don't you mean sagittal?
Comment by Anvh posted on Venturing into the World of primes at 08/09/2010 - 04:38
It might be a good idea for some photos but with my last vacation shot 12GB worth on photos, I don't think its a great idea to upload them and certainly NOT abroad.
What would the roaming cost be than?
You also need an awful lot of iThings to get it to work, I at least have non and sounds complicated.
Why not a netbook with a 250GB hard disk and with a kind of video out?
It can store the photos and display them on not just yours but any tv and that for the same price an iPod 64GB touch cost.
but you are correct, the cards are cheaper, but it is difficult to COPY your images as backups without some other device....
The camera has a card reader, USB, LCD screen and controls all you need is the ability to recognize USB storage device (I believe that's a standard code) and instructions so you can copy/backup photos.
The camera can already read FAT and all PC OS can read that as well, what more do you need?
Comment by Anvh posted on USB flash drive instead of memorycard? at 08/09/2010 - 04:00
Ipod/ipad camera connectivity kit... if you got an ipod/pad
If you're going to take a storage device than the iPod/iPhone/iPad isn't the way to go because they cost a lot for just storage
It's better to get extra SDHC cards.
For the price of the iPod touch 64GB you can almost get 3 Sandisk Extreme III 32GB cards.
And if we compare it to a Western digital 2.5" 1TB USB hard-disk you can get 2 (and a half).
So if a camera can do the transfer you would have great bang for you bucks in term of storage.
Comment by Anvh posted on USB flash drive instead of memorycard? at 08/09/2010 - 01:32
The best I could find were the TrustFire 18500 1800mAh
The cheapest I could find was here link
£8,63 for 2 (Free P&P)
Comment by Anvh posted on K-7 replacement battery D-LI90 at 08/09/2010 - 00:45
So far it looks really good and can't wait to give it a spin.
Comment by Anvh posted on Nik HDR Efex Pro at 08/09/2010 - 00:43
The camera is a USB slave device and as such cannot directly communicate with another slave device. If the was a master then it would not be able to communicate with a PC.
I agree with your second point though but it would be great if you could connect an USB hard-disk to your camera and transfer the photos from the card on to that, it would mean for example that you don't need to carry a laptop on vacation or several cards
Comment by Anvh posted on USB flash drive instead of memorycard? at 08/09/2010 - 00:22
You've from now till 14th of September to vote what you think is the best entry for the theme.
When voting is closed the photographer behind each photo will be revealed.
They are placed in no particular order.
#1
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/Shed-Rust-2010-08-27-008-1.jpg[/IMG]
#2
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP8550-1.jpg[/IMG]
#3
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP8132-1.jpg[/IMG]
#4
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP5925-1.jpg[/IMG]
#5
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP3363-1adj.jpg[/IMG]
#6
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/igp3992-1.jpg[/IMG]
#7
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/_PRI0710-1.jpg[/IMG]
#8
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/_IGP9466-1.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by Anvh posted on Voting Competition #2 - The Votes at 08/09/2010 - 00:06
If they are around 70mm than they use the 18650 batteries so you can up the capacity quite a lot
I just measured the battery compartment of the K10D and that's 60mm deep so you can't fit 65mm inside that
edit: looked up the size of the K7 battery and it's 55mm so those are 18500 as well
Comment by Anvh posted on K-7 replacement battery D-LI90 at 07/09/2010 - 23:33


Since the field of focus is a certain distance wide the focus can be a little different but not by much though.