Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
The only thing I can think off is that one time it approach the focus from the front and the other time from the back.
Since the field of focus is a certain distance wide the focus can be a little different but not by much though.

Comment by Anvh posted on Lens based autofocus inconsistencies at 08/09/2010 - 13:21

Anvh
Indeed it's an even field qua quality so that's very nice

Comment by Anvh posted on Voting Competition #2 - The Votes at 08/09/2010 - 13:15

Anvh
rparmar wrote:
Anvh wrote:
The FA43 is not as sharp lens wide open either but for the rest I don't really know, I haven't really looked at enough photos from that lens to judge it.
The FA43 is plenty sharp wide open. I have more than one thread on this matter over at Pentax Forums. The problem is usually in focusing at f/1.9. And of course it is not a flat field lens so don't expect to shoot a brick wall and have it sharp in the corners. But who does that wide open?
And this doesn't apply to th DA*55 f/1.4 because?

Quote:
Anvh wrote:
This just a feeling though but I've the idea that FA lenses worked better on film than on digital, do you think that's true?
Sensors are more revealing of flaws than film. APS-C is not the same as FF. These two factors may have something to do with a person's interpretation of lens performance, but this would not be restricted to consideration of the FA43.
Was not talking about just the FA43 but all FA and film lenses.
It's just that those lenses are never made to be used on digital and they are missing some optimization. I wonder if there is a service that can coat the rear element to improve them on digital?

rparmar wrote:
Anvh wrote:
Aren't all lenses designed for optimal overall preformance?
I don't know what you mean with absolute measurements though
There is a document somewhere that discusses this. In short, lenses are typically designed to have no field curvature at the focal plane. But the Limited lenses retain small amounts of field curvature so that they may completely correct astigmatic difference in both meridional and sagittal subject planes.

If you don't get what that means, don't worry. It wrecks my head too. But it is reassuring to know that I have not been imagining the differences between my FA43 and FA77 and other lenses I have used.
I think i got it.
But field curvature is only one aspect of a lens so how can you call that overall performance? Also so far as I know only Macro lenses are designed to have a very flat field and i don't see why it's important with normal lens besides very fast ones or at least why it is more important than correcting other aberrations.

Just a note but I believe having a flat field curvature or little astigmatism is the same thing or are at least closely related.
And meridional plane are you sure about that, don't you mean sagittal?

Comment by Anvh posted on Venturing into the World of primes at 08/09/2010 - 04:38

Anvh
Don, there are some problems with the uploading part.
It might be a good idea for some photos but with my last vacation shot 12GB worth on photos, I don't think its a great idea to upload them and certainly NOT abroad.
What would the roaming cost be than?

You also need an awful lot of iThings to get it to work, I at least have non and sounds complicated.
Why not a netbook with a 250GB hard disk and with a kind of video out?
It can store the photos and display them on not just yours but any tv and that for the same price an iPod 64GB touch cost.

Don wrote:
but you are correct, the cards are cheaper, but it is difficult to COPY your images as backups without some other device....
But what if the camera could be that device.
The camera has a card reader, USB, LCD screen and controls all you need is the ability to recognize USB storage device (I believe that's a standard code) and instructions so you can copy/backup photos.
The camera can already read FAT and all PC OS can read that as well, what more do you need?

Comment by Anvh posted on USB flash drive instead of memorycard? at 08/09/2010 - 04:00

Anvh
Don wrote:
Ipod/ipad camera connectivity kit... if you got an ipod/pad
But you still need to take with an extra device for than

If you're going to take a storage device than the iPod/iPhone/iPad isn't the way to go because they cost a lot for just storage
It's better to get extra SDHC cards.
For the price of the iPod touch 64GB you can almost get 3 Sandisk Extreme III 32GB cards.
And if we compare it to a Western digital 2.5" 1TB USB hard-disk you can get 2 (and a half).

So if a camera can do the transfer you would have great bang for you bucks in term of storage.

Comment by Anvh posted on USB flash drive instead of memorycard? at 08/09/2010 - 01:32

Anvh
K10D wrote:
Some other data.

link


link

Regards
Wrong batteries those are 18650 and those are 15mm longer than the 18500 that are in the Pentax so they won't fit

The best I could find were the TrustFire 18500 1800mAh
The cheapest I could find was here link
£8,63 for 2 (Free P&P)

Comment by Anvh posted on K-7 replacement battery D-LI90 at 08/09/2010 - 00:45

Anvh
Have you already seen this upcoming Lightroom plug-in? link

So far it looks really good and can't wait to give it a spin.

Comment by Anvh posted on Nik HDR Efex Pro at 08/09/2010 - 00:43

Anvh
polchraine wrote:
The camera is a USB slave device and as such cannot directly communicate with another slave device. If the was a master then it would not be able to communicate with a PC.
Is there no way to switch?

I agree with your second point though but it would be great if you could connect an USB hard-disk to your camera and transfer the photos from the card on to that, it would mean for example that you don't need to carry a laptop on vacation or several cards

Comment by Anvh posted on USB flash drive instead of memorycard? at 08/09/2010 - 00:22

Anvh
The entries of the Voting competition #2 - Patina, Patination, Signs of Ageing
You've from now till 14th of September to vote what you think is the best entry for the theme.
When voting is closed the photographer behind each photo will be revealed.

They are placed in no particular order.

#1
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/Shed-Rust-2010-08-27-008-1.jpg[/IMG]

#2
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP8550-1.jpg[/IMG]

#3
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP8132-1.jpg[/IMG]

#4
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP5925-1.jpg[/IMG]

#5
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/IMGP3363-1adj.jpg[/IMG]

#6
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/igp3992-1.jpg[/IMG]

#7
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/_PRI0710-1.jpg[/IMG]

#8
[IMG]http://i1012.photobucket.com/albums/af242/PUFvoting/2%20Patina%20Patination%20Signs%20of%20Ageing/_IGP9466-1.jpg[/IMG]

Comment by Anvh posted on Voting Competition #2 - The Votes at 08/09/2010 - 00:06

Anvh
John how much longer are they?
If they are around 70mm than they use the 18650 batteries so you can up the capacity quite a lot

I just measured the battery compartment of the K10D and that's 60mm deep so you can't fit 65mm inside that

edit: looked up the size of the K7 battery and it's 55mm so those are 18500 as well

Comment by Anvh posted on K-7 replacement battery D-LI90 at 07/09/2010 - 23:33

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo