Anvh

Joined: 4th July 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Anvh
MarkTaylor wrote:
OTOH if a JPEG looks fine straight out of the camera or needs only minor tweaking, I see no reason to waste time working with the RAW file.
Quality.
The RAW file has more details and 14bit of colour information, JPG only 8bit but in all honesty you need to look really good and have the ability to display the differnces and most can't.

I only shoot in RAW now, it only takes 1 click with the mouse to convert it into a JPG but you can never turn a JPG into a RAW.

Comment by Anvh posted on K5 and all those digital filters and effects ! at 09/03/2011 - 20:31

Anvh
Journalist photographers have a good reason to shoot in JPG, they often have no time to edit their photo's and to send all the photo's to the office in RAW

MartynUK wrote:
But I've often wondered whether, infact, the in-camera JPEG processing is superior to anything that external programs could produce.
Your computer and the software on it is much more sophisticated and has more power then your camera.

At least ACR is able to pull more details out of the photo then the camera can.
Here you can find the comparison.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/K5IMAGING.HTM

Comment by Anvh posted on K5 and all those digital filters and effects ! at 09/03/2011 - 17:49

Anvh
Some guys have too much free time on their hand...
Homemade laser gun
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUXXGbNS8oY&feature=player_embedded

Comment by Anvh posted on Another pointless thread at 09/03/2011 - 17:42

Anvh
womble wrote:
giofi wrote:
fatspider wrote:
and they did have the K5 limited in silver in a display cabinet with the 43mm Ltd.
Does the k-5 limited look as good as in the picture published on the web?
It looked very pretty indeed!
Well it's on my list now.
Asked the local shop here for the price and it was very good so i'm going to try to get one.

Just found out they are limited though so hopefully i can get one.

Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax prices at Focus NEC show & the Pentax stand... at 08/03/2011 - 22:32

Anvh
Gwyn wrote:
It sounds to have been a better stand the they had at Photokina in any case - there they had just two K-5s and one (or maybe two) 645Ds to play with. They had more K-rs than K-5s. And no freebies whatsoever .
Played with the 645D and got a pentax shirt at zoom

Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax prices at Focus NEC show & the Pentax stand... at 08/03/2011 - 22:27

Anvh
ManixZero wrote:
Next? 35mm f2.4(MMmmmm) or f2.8(Grrrrrrr)
Or FA35 f/2.0 it appears the optics are the same as the f/2.4 but i've no idea about the price.

Since you already have the 15 and 24 why not get the 35 limited and the 70 to complete the set?

Comment by Anvh posted on Zooms or Primes at 08/03/2011 - 21:16

Anvh
This one should have answers to most of your questions but it's a bit deep sometimes.
www.cambridgeincolour.com

For editing there are a lot of tips and tricks to find on the web so just search and you will find.

Comment by Anvh posted on Getting started with digital photography! ;) at 08/03/2011 - 20:33

Anvh
Like what has been said no real flare or ghosting issue's with the lens.
Reviews seem to agree.

http://www.lenstip.com/202.9-Lens_review-Pentax_smc_DA_18-55_mm_f_3.5-5.6_AL_II_...
The anti-reflexive coatings of the Pentax and the blackening the inside part of its tubus make the performance against bright light very good. You can notice some small and weak artifacts but they don’t constitute a serious problem.

Comment by Anvh posted on K-R kit lens flare and ghosting at 08/03/2011 - 20:29

Anvh
Judith Ann,
Seems it's already explained, just think of detective movies most of them are Noire to.

I think you could combine the two, will give it a try if i've time but no promises.

Comment by Anvh posted on Discussion for Competition #63 Noir at 08/03/2011 - 11:20

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo