All Forum Comments
Comment by Anvh posted on Raw v Jpeg at 08/05/2011 - 10:12
I think you overestimate the "slamming" forces, Stefan.
I don't know how heavy the mirror is and how fast it moves but i would find it very strange that the force you apply with a soft brush would be greater.
here is the K-X in action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFDas-9UJS4
And here it is in slowmo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJiIQZ9iX-k&feature=related
It's marvelous to see how fast and precise it is but it is anything but a subtle movement.
So if the mirror would start moving because i touch it lightly with a brush it would most likely move during the action as well by the air it moves around and when the mirror start and stop moving.
Comment by Anvh posted on Dust on ,my focus screen at 08/05/2011 - 10:05
Sour grapes, folks. Pentax already have a head start over the Nikon and Canon FF line ups. They have the 31, 43 and 77 FA ltds - lenses which are 'suboptimal' on APSC.
Comment by Anvh posted on Pentax FF - a poll at 07/05/2011 - 21:35
Comment by Anvh posted on A Viewfinder Problem Solved. at 07/05/2011 - 21:26
http://www.visibledust.com/products3.php?pid=603
Comment by Anvh posted on Dust on ,my focus screen at 07/05/2011 - 21:23
then pat yourself on the back for the money you saved!
Comment by Anvh posted on A Viewfinder Problem Solved. at 07/05/2011 - 18:47
Comment by Anvh posted on Add a Photo to a Post at 07/05/2011 - 18:45
Is sure believe you that it's precision mechanism and fragile but i don't believe it's that fragile that the forces of the brush will actually do any harm unless you are using a hard brush of course but we are talking about the butterfly now and that's a soft brush. You don't even have to press the hairs against the mirror since it's the static charge of the hairs that do the work so you have to ever so lightly just "caress" the mirror once, a good puff of air might even result in a higher force on the mirror.
Comment by Anvh posted on Dust on ,my focus screen at 07/05/2011 - 18:41
Damn you Stefan:arrow:
Just shelled out big for the 222!
In the end I knew I just wouldn't be happy with anything else so the bag budget is blown and then some!
Lightweight bag will be a Tesco's carrier bag now methinks...
Sadly i've only use it 2 times now so can't really say how good or bad it is.
I had bought it for weekends away or when going on long walk but sadly i didn't had the time to do any of that.
I did went away on photo trips but those whore in the city and there i find a shoulder bag with less gear far more handy because the bag is very big.
So far i've been happy with it though but look around for the price and if you can't find anything the shop i linked to might sell to the UK, i doubt that will eb a problem.
If they had that bag in Black I'd get it. Good idea with the hydration pack in the laptop compartment.
I've been thinking as well to convert a 60 liter back to a photo back as well.
I believe it was Lowe (or berghaus) that had actually 2 main compartment that you could access separately, you might give them a look if you think about doing that.
For one day hike the Kata is good enough but you can't carry anything that will get you through the night so you will need something bigger/better for a weekend or very technical walks.
Comment by Anvh posted on Backpack woes... at 07/05/2011 - 18:25
Just found this link which would appear to answer all of the questions about print resolution.
link
North-light has great articles about colour management as well.
Comment by Anvh posted on Pixels per dot...a printing question at 07/05/2011 - 18:12


In the middle there is a comparison.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/K5IMAGING.HTM
RAW has a lot more fine details and less halos from sharpening.