aminstar

Joined: 30th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

aminstar
Hi everyone

I came across this problem just by chance while trying to focus on the edge of a tree trunk.

What I suddenly realised was that it wasn't locking on unless I aimed slightly lower to the edge with the red focusing dot on my viewfinder, then it would lock and snap. And suddenly I found that the part of the tree trunk I was aiming to focus at in the beginning came out pretty sharper although that wasn't where I aimed at.

Then I decided to carry out some tests and this is what I found out.
So I am hoping someone could give me some idea of what is happening and what I need to do. I suspect this might require me digging in further into the manual but it would be great help and steping stone if someone could just briefly explain me what is going on.

All the images that are out of focus were aimed at the flower. Spot on in the middle of the flower and the images came out all out of focus.

The images that came sharper were all aimed at the bottom of the flower, right where the left leaf has grown. And I notice that these came out with the flowers sharpened.

I think this is an issue only with my 55-300 as the 100mm macro is the other one that I tend to use but I haven't noticed anything wrong with it. Having said that, I wasn't looking for any faults so I will go and check for the AF with that too.

Any help and advice is greatly appreciated

All images are 100% crop. To be sure that it wasn't just hand shake or breeze moving the flower I took 3 snaps at each focusing spot using the tripod


Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment by aminstar posted on Help with AF with Pentax 55-300 mm at 05/03/2009 - 12:40

aminstar
Mike-P wrote:

Amin.

All my shots are handheld, I very very rarely use a tripod as I just find it too much hassle (which is why I probably bin a lot of shots).
I am not sure why but Flickr strips the Exif in all but the original size.
Oh I saw the EXIF on your gallery . nice shot, worth keeping it there as part of your portfolio.

About handheld or tripod , I fully agree with you, tripod is always such a hassle , but you definitely have done pretty well. These shots seem to be spot on on sharpness, am not sure if a tripod would have enhanced it further.

Comment by aminstar posted on Robin in the garden at 05/03/2009 - 11:37

aminstar
Great shots Mike

Did you take these ones handheld or on a tripod?

I wonder why they dont show any EXIF on the photo when I right click on it. Usually I am able to see as I am using firefox.

Thanks

Amin

Comment by aminstar posted on Robin in the garden at 05/03/2009 - 11:25

aminstar
Thanks everyone for all the input .

Helps with the motivation knowing I have been improving and taking my tiny steps towards better images

Comment by aminstar posted on Thought I should take another shot at wildlife at 05/03/2009 - 11:21

aminstar
Jackie, these are all cracking shots, . The moment I look at them they immediately capture my full attention and I keep going up and down viewing it times and times again. Love the way the lighting reflects from some of the petals and the shiny bits from the inner part of the petals and outer ones, on the 2 and 3. Difficult even to select the most favourite one , I like them all.

Why aren't they in your gallery? , You should put them up , they look great to me.

Amin

Comment by aminstar posted on Crocus at 05/03/2009 - 07:16

aminstar
Kenty wrote:
Yes - agree the comments. These are constructive and not destructive comments and are designed to help.

I've had some 'negative' comments but they've helped me technically or from a composition point of view.

And welcome to the forum.

Cheers

John
John,
Let's see a couple of images which you had some "negative" comments. May be we all could learn from it too

I have seen your gallery and your portfolio website. Definitely impressed. So would be nice to see the road that lead to those fantastic images. Are we talking decades ago here?

Comment by aminstar posted on First photo submission. at 03/03/2009 - 09:55

aminstar
loskeran wrote:
aminstar wrote:
Mike

Is this the one you mean? link


Gosh, the price, hehehe.
Are you sitting back on your chair Amin
The best advice I can give you is stick with the lenses you have learn the "ropes" try taking images with what you have.
I noticed all of the shots that you took of the birds were done with the 100mm at f2.8, experiment at "closing" the lens down abit to get an even better depth of field, (DOF) you may find even better detail.
Not many lens give the best wide open, give it a go, and just see what happens.
Great advice Richard. Bound to follow that, will keep me off the shed with cold sandwiches for a good while .

Regarding the F stops on the 100 mm. With the grey skyes yesterday, it was so dark and I just couldn't manage to close the stop and not have the blinking flash light request from my K20 everytime, and the shutter speed going down. So it was a compromise.

Unless I am missing something here or a trick that if there is you all could give me some tips. Basically whenever I tried to stop the lens down consequently it affected the shutter speed and I did increase the ISO to what I thought it should be the limits.

The couple of the peacocks one I did manage to use the stop at f5 but I was lucky that the angles of the subjects were higher and getting more light. The ducks were really on an enclosed space.

Let's hope the sun stays on for a little longer as I am right in the middle of paperwork (grrr hate it ) and soon I finish I would love to go out wiht my 55-300 to a nearby nature reserve and see if I can make more use of my lens

Thanks again for all the help, its really useful

Amin

Comment by aminstar posted on DA*300 and Sigma 150-500 at 02/03/2009 - 12:41

aminstar
Mike-P wrote:
Ah yes, forgot .. it was £750 or thereabouts a few weeks ago

Unlocker has one but I think he's a bit busy atm.
Mike

If this lens was around that price then it would certainly be a contender for the DA*300 in my view for my personal needs. Only thing that would make me hesitate is the weight addition. Having handled the DA*300 I feel that I could easily manage to shoot handheld on many situations if push come to shove, but I am not sure this would be still ok with that added weight of the sigma.

Oh, and it doesnt seem to have HSM. Testing the 150-500 I was truly marvelled by it

Gosh what a jump in price wow

Comment by aminstar posted on DA*300 and Sigma 150-500 at 02/03/2009 - 12:20

aminstar
Mike

Is this the one you mean? link

Gosh, the price, hehehe.

Know anyone around here who have it or used it?

Any links with images I could have a quick look? The spec look great, apart of being a bit on the heavy side compared to the DA*300, but again the zoom is a huge plus

Comment by aminstar posted on DA*300 and Sigma 150-500 at 02/03/2009 - 12:14

aminstar
Mike-P wrote:
Maybe you should be looking at the Sigma 100-300mm f4?
Has the zoom requirements and by all accounts very good IQ as well.
Plus you can bang on the Sigma 1.4EX TC for a 420mm f5.6
Mike,

That's interesting to know, because I definitely could do with the zoom, if it doesn't come at a cost of image quality.

Let me check the prices and do a quick research. In the meantime anything else you all could add to help in my decision is really greatly appreciated.

Mike, thank you so much for this, off to look at it now

Comment by aminstar posted on DA*300 and Sigma 150-500 at 02/03/2009 - 12:12

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo