aliengrove

Joined: 3rd January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

aliengrove
amoringello wrote:
I know someone who owns one of these and says they work great!

http://www.lightningtrigger.com/

They are a bit pricey, but apparently it is more than a light sensor. It is also supposed to work on the change in charge in the air before the strike happens as well as the light. Although I am finding it difficult to find that information on their website.

Pentax is listed with an "n/a" on their compatibility list. I'm not sure if that means it will not work, or simply that they have not tested. You may try to contact them and see what they think.

I believe they are also built to order, so I don't know what sort of distribution they handle. (US Only??)
They are selling a cord for Pentax, so I assume it must work on Pentaxes. What camera is the person you know using? It would be interesting to compare the shutter lag on that camera to the K5's. I would be ordering it for delivery in the USA.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Lightning trigger at 07/07/2012 - 13:19

aliengrove
I do have a PK/A adapter, I just thought of having one on each lens, though I can swap them round. I hardly use the 90mm, anyway, there's no bugs, plants or much else in the macro world here, save what's in our small garden. The ide of using the converter is very attractive, I would probably sell my Tokina 80-400 if I bought the Tamron. Any ideas about price (assuming you want to sell)?

Comment by aliengrove posted on Recommendations for fast manual zoom? at 07/07/2012 - 13:09

aliengrove
Am I right in thinking this lens would also work with the matched 2X converter I have for my
Adaptall 2 SP 90mm f2.5 macro lens?

Comment by aliengrove posted on Recommendations for fast manual zoom? at 07/07/2012 - 12:30

aliengrove
Mike-P wrote:
womble wrote:
Tamron SP 80-200 f/2.8 Adaptall 2, model 30A?

I actually have one of thse I was thinking of selling.
Just been reading some reviews on this lens, sounds like it's just what I am looking for....though would have preferred a zoom lens starting with a slightly shorter focal length.
Do you want to make me an offer I can't refuse, Mike?
Also, would it come with a PK/A adaptor?

Comment by aliengrove posted on Recommendations for fast manual zoom? at 07/07/2012 - 12:22

aliengrove
I am looking for a fast (constant f2.8 ) manual focus zoom, and am wondering if anyone has any recommendations? Is there anything available somewhere around the range of say the DA* 50-135? It has to be f2.8, I have an SMC Pentax-A 35-105mm F3.5, which is a fantastic lens, but I would like an extra stop, which could be the difference between shooting at 6400 or 3200 ISO. The reason I want a manual zoom is I want to be able to manually focus at infinity in very weak light, where AF won't work, and I have found my AF lenses are not very good at this, with infinity seeming to vary slightly at different focal lengths. Plus, being an eternal optimist, I don't want to buy any more DA lenses until I see if Pentax are going to bring out a full-frame model later this year.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Recommendations for fast manual zoom? at 07/07/2012 - 06:02

aliengrove
Thanks for the replies. The company that makes these claims they work on any camera with a shutter lag of less than 120 milliseconds. The K5's shutter lag is 92ms. It seems a bit of a risk spending all that money and then finding it doesn't work, but I may try it. Bulb is not an option, I want to shhot lightning from an aircraft.

I have had limited success using exposures of 3 to 5 seconds handheld, as long as there is no moon (the clouds end up blurred) and only one lightning flash, which acts like a flashgun. Some taken on my K5 can be seen here . I only have about a 1% success rate using this method though.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Lightning trigger at 07/07/2012 - 05:24

aliengrove
womble wrote:
I hate to be critical, but this doesn't seem the best of adverts for a superb camera. The highlights appear blown to me, and the horizon appears to be at quite a jaunty angle. I dare say a bit of post-processing on the RAW file to recover the highlights, open up the shadows and correct the horizon might improve the image a fair bit.

Cheers, Kris.
I totally agree The WB looks a bit out, too, the sky is a decidedly odd colour.

The second is much better but could do with some more shadow detail.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Image taken with my new 645D at 06/07/2012 - 13:51

aliengrove

Comment by aliengrove posted on Bad Olympic photos at 05/07/2012 - 10:30

aliengrove
Thanks for all the comments!

Frogfish wrote:
Great set ! How did you get to take these (assume scheduled consumer flight - which route) ?

I like the last the best - those glaciers are immense and numerous. It looks as though there are half a dozen avalanches going on (though I'm sure it's just wisps of cloud) !
The images were taken enroute from Doha to Osaka, from 33000 feet.

Comment by aliengrove posted on First time lucky with a Kx at 04/07/2012 - 16:08

aliengrove
I have to say I find the K5's built in HDR function little more than a gimmick, and a pretty poor one at that. Far better to bracket shots and do it yourself, you can also do it from one image at a push.

Comment by aliengrove posted on Blown-out Sky at 04/07/2012 - 09:15

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo