Image taken with my new 645D
Posted 05/07/2012 - 21:57
Link
I hate to be critical, but this doesn't seem the best of adverts for a superb camera. The highlights appear blown to me, and the horizon appears to be at quite a jaunty angle. I dare say a bit of post-processing on the RAW file to recover the highlights, open up the shadows and correct the horizon might improve the image a fair bit.
Cheers, Kris.
Cheers, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 05/07/2012 - 23:07
Link
The fact of the matter is that you can't tell anything much about a picture 1000 pixels wide. Inevitably, therefore, it'll be judged on the merits of the image, not what it was taken on.
I agree with Kris. The highlights appear bright, not quite blown, on my monitor. But without seeing the amazing detail the 645D is capable of, I'm not sure this image is especially representative.
I agree with Kris. The highlights appear bright, not quite blown, on my monitor. But without seeing the amazing detail the 645D is capable of, I'm not sure this image is especially representative.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 06/07/2012 - 09:50
Link
Many thanks you all for your comments. I will reduce the Pixel size in future when posting images.
Posted 06/07/2012 - 11:42
Link
OMG, I think I would kill (certainly kidnap) for the chance to use that piece of kit on my shoot this afternoon. I'm nearly crying...
Time for a cup of tea and a hobnob.
Time for a cup of tea and a hobnob.
Posted 06/07/2012 - 13:00
Link
Darkmunk wrote:
OMG, I think I would kill (certainly kidnap) for the chance to use that piece of kit on my shoot this afternoon. I'm nearly crying...
Time for a cup of tea and a hobnob.
Bit extreme. Just rent one.OMG, I think I would kill (certainly kidnap) for the chance to use that piece of kit on my shoot this afternoon. I'm nearly crying...
Time for a cup of tea and a hobnob.
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 06/07/2012 - 13:16
Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
Good point. Where can you rent one?
SRS?
Good point. Where can you rent one?
Posted 06/07/2012 - 13:20
Link
Just popped up the road and took this image in B&W. I took the image yesterday in colour. Just fancied having a play around with the 645D.
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t4/TAYSPRINGER/dam.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t4/TAYSPRINGER/dam.jpg[/IMG]
Posted 06/07/2012 - 13:20
Link
Gwyn wrote:
That's what I thought too but they don't list it Pentaxophile wrote:
Good point. Where can you rent one?
SRS?Good point. Where can you rent one?
Amazing camera but without usability with K-mount lenses, my interest is limited. (As if I could ever afford it!)
I suspect if you're a landscape shooter who just needs one or two quality primes, it's the ultimate camera though.
Posted 06/07/2012 - 13:51
Link
womble wrote:
I hate to be critical, but this doesn't seem the best of adverts for a superb camera. The highlights appear blown to me, and the horizon appears to be at quite a jaunty angle. I dare say a bit of post-processing on the RAW file to recover the highlights, open up the shadows and correct the horizon might improve the image a fair bit.
Cheers, Kris.
I totally agree The WB looks a bit out, too, the sky is a decidedly odd colour.I hate to be critical, but this doesn't seem the best of adverts for a superb camera. The highlights appear blown to me, and the horizon appears to be at quite a jaunty angle. I dare say a bit of post-processing on the RAW file to recover the highlights, open up the shadows and correct the horizon might improve the image a fair bit.
Cheers, Kris.
The second is much better but could do with some more shadow detail.
Posted 06/07/2012 - 17:00
Link
I'm always interested in the benefits of full frame/medium format but must admit, as already mentioned above I'm not sure the images in this thread are achieving your original intention...perhaps you could add your thoughts on the 645 vs for example the K5 ?
Simon
Simon
My website http://www.landscapephotographyuk.com
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
42 posts
14 years
[IMG]http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t4/TAYSPRINGER/adf.jpg[/IMG]
This image was taken at the Queens View at Pitlochry, Scotland.