Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
That combination isn't supposed to work Maybe they badged
some SHQ's as MC's

If it's not prompting for the FL you might find the answer in
this thread link unfortunately it's been bloated out to 39 pages
long by people who don't know what they are talking
about and don't even own a TC, but like to think
that they can just imagine an answer

Comment by Algernon posted on Anyone tried DA* 300mm with Kenko 1.5x at 17/12/2011 - 11:28

Algernon
nimasmi wrote:
obione wrote:
18-55 WR works far better on the k5
Sounds like the type of thing an ebay seller would say

Comment by Algernon posted on DA 18-55 WR "better" on K-5 than K-7? at 17/12/2011 - 11:24

Algernon
The TC seems to be working perfectly even though it didn't
say SHQ on the TC or the box? (Pz-AF 1.5x Teleplus MC)

Are you setting the FL manually?.... from the exif it's
showing 300mm you need to set 450mm?

Comment by Algernon posted on Anyone tried DA* 300mm with Kenko 1.5x at 17/12/2011 - 11:04

Algernon
dougf8 wrote:
DA35 on the right, resized down from screen capture on iMac
You can't tell too much from one shot especially when you don't know where they are focussed. That's why I prefer lenses that work at infinity.... usually everything from about 5m to infinity is then in focus.

It might be the lighting, but the one on the left looks sharper, but considering it's a prime against a zoom I would be surprised if it was.

Mine seems quite sharp right across the frame, but the lights been bad.
It does look good though in the shadow areas which means it has good contrast.

Comment by Algernon posted on NOT HAPPY with my DA 35mm F2.4AL at 17/12/2011 - 10:55

Algernon
Great ads.... that little girl must be only 8 inches tall

Comment by Algernon posted on Early 2012 Pentax Optio Model on Wikileaks ?????? at 16/12/2011 - 18:28

Algernon
I can't remember my FA 50mm f/1.4 (which I sold 18 months ago)
doing that and all my pentax MF primes don't go beyond infinity.
I normally just set anything from 24mm to 35mm to infinity and
leave it there.

The only MF prime I have that goes beyond INF is the Sigma II
24mm.

I suppose if other people have 35mm f/2.4's that go beyond
infinity I'll just have to live with it.

Comment by Algernon posted on NOT HAPPY with my DA 35mm F2.4AL at 16/12/2011 - 17:23

Algernon
Gwyn wrote:
Algernon wrote:

How are other people finding their's focuses on infinity?
Spot on or just a bit off?

I'll let you know next Tuesday hopefully.

It does sound as if they are a bit of a duff lot though .
The boxes look brand new and unopened, so I'm quite sure they aren't returns.

The colour rendering using AWB especially considering the time of year is spot on with Jpegs

Comment by Algernon posted on NOT HAPPY with my DA 35mm F2.4AL at 16/12/2011 - 10:24

Algernon
Mine seems OK on AF, but on manual focus it's going
just beyond infinity which I'm not happy about.

How are other people finding their's focuses on infinity?
Spot on or just a bit off?

Edit: The image in the viewfinder is good enough to
focus on.

Comment by Algernon posted on NOT HAPPY with my DA 35mm F2.4AL at 16/12/2011 - 09:46

Algernon
As long as it doesn't say "made in china from scrap slot machine parts" it should be alight

Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax K5 made in China ? at 15/12/2011 - 19:28

Algernon
Pentaxophile wrote:
I'm not surprised, technology moves fast. What does surprise me is they've done so with no replacement announced!
Panasonic did a similar thing about 5 years ago. They discontinued all their TV DVD/HDD recorders without any replacements being available and once they dried up in the shops you couldn't buy a Panasonic recorder anywhere. I managed to find one in Argos and then about two months later new models started to appear. Even Richer hadn't got any.

Comment by Algernon posted on Official K-r gone. What will replace it? at 15/12/2011 - 13:47

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo