The only way to answer this correctly/exactly/precisely is to flip a coin

--

I'm driving down that lonesome road again

--

Pentax Roadmap....... Can I get a version for my SatNav

--

Be quick one day left
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Rare-Pentax-Infrared-Remote-Control-System-Transmitte...

INFORMATION LINK

https://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/pentaxlx/remote/index.h...

--

But that's not a spelling mistake

One of the other main reasons that moaners/screamers quoted for needing FF was it produced better Bokeh Since the K-1 was released I haven't seen much evidence of the better bokeh from most users

Pentax even produced a 70-210mm sharp at f/2.8 to give really good bokeh. Now the cries are for an f/4 version and sod the bokeh

The 60-250mm already exists and the main complaints about that was that it was only f/4. It only needs a baffle removing to use on FF so a 70-210mm f/4 is totally un-needed. They would be better working on something else.

--





--

Is the camera stuck in the upside down position or can it be turned right way up

--

You can't blame Pentax ..... Users originally asked for a FF camera so that they could use all their old film lenses on it. They didn't ask for a FF camera plus lenses

Ricoh are supposed to have 100 people working on new lenses.

--

If I click quote in Firefox it doesn't show any spelling errors apart from words it hasn't got in the UK English dictionary such as Asahi. 'premieres' is flagged up because it hasn't got that either, but it looks right to me. So NO spelling mistakes as far as I'm concerened

--

I've no problem with the odd post asking for video even though Pentax don't really do video but it's pointless asking on an almost daily basis especially after solutions have been pointed out such as.... Sigma lenses some of which have stabilization or even a K-5. That's just Trolling!



--