Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
You will have to cut that. It's worth doing, easier if it can be
removed from the lens..... otherwise mask with tape and thick
string.

Comment by Algernon posted on early Vivitar Series 1 70-210 to Pentax (K10D) DSLR ??? at 29/04/2012 - 10:17

Algernon
I was going to put one of these on sale last year and had typed the
following and posted the photos (to a server) and then decided not
to go ahead, because it's such a nice sharp lens even though I
rarely use it and also have the 85mm and 120mm. I also didn't
want to break up the trio.

If it's of any interest at £115 inc RMND (By 1pm) Delivery to UK
please let me know. Payment by Bank Transfer, Paypal (Gift) or
cash deposit at any branch of Barclays in the UK.

If (after 3 days) Nass isn't interested I'm willing to let it
go to any other interested pentaxian at the same price.

=====PASTE==========================================

Body : Excellent condition, no serious marks, just a slight bit of normal
handling wear/patina on the rubber grip, which is normal for M Series
lenses. There is a very slight mark on the bottom of the
aperture ring 2-3mm long, (see picture) probably from resting camera on a
wall or similar, although it does look like a manufacturing defect.
The Gold JCII PASSED sticker shows very slight signs of wear,
(usually a good sign of how a lens has been handled).
The lens has been very carefully looked after.

Glass: Immaculate... no haze, fungus, cleaning marks, or scratches, there
might be some very fine specks of dust inside lens, but I can't see any so
I must be going blind if there is.

Mechanics: Aperture ring works perfectly. Snappy aperture, no oil on blades,
stops down quickly to the set shooting aperture.The focus is positive, which
is about normal for a telephoto and perfect for the way I use this type
of lens.


Bayonet shows hardly any signs of use.


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Small mark on Aperture ring (lower right) hardly noticeable.

Comment Image


PRICE: £115 including RMND (By 1pm) Delivery to UK or Insured Post to Irish Republic.

Comment by Algernon posted on Wanted: 100m K,SMC,M or A not macro at 29/04/2012 - 10:08

Algernon
Some interesting links on this page..... mostly hardware

Comment by Algernon posted on Time Lapse Video at 27/04/2012 - 19:20

Algernon
steven9761 wrote:
DRORLOFF - I think this lens is circa 1976. According to the link below, it was listed in the Photopia catalogue around that time. It's the only source of info I could find that refers to PALAR. It also seems an interesting article in itself.

link
Fascinating read about the History of Photopia... who of course
are now the Pentax Service Agents. It's amazing how rapidly a
lot of these photographic companies shot up from nowehere
after the war.

This lens is probably the same as most of the other 200mm f/3.5
lenses sold under different brands such as Vivitar. Probably
made by Komine. Not a bad performer for the price, although
200's as a group aren't that hot anyway.

Comment by Algernon posted on FS:Palar Auto 200mm f3.5 (Not A Clue Either) at 26/04/2012 - 19:10

Algernon
My version of timelapse consists of using a CCTV Camera and a Winfast capture card using an economical codec, capturing what I want then playing it back at 256 to 1024 x normal speed

Comment by Algernon posted on Time Lapse Video at 26/04/2012 - 12:03

Algernon
Just looked on youtube and it does seem like the shoot stills.

This is one covering a day with the K-5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBhvKsV7Dvw

Edit: Seems PK_Tether can do it easily, although I'm
sure the camera can do it on it's own as well.

http://vimeo.com/18845267

Comment by Algernon posted on Time Lapse Video at 26/04/2012 - 11:04

Algernon
I thought the K-5 had timelapse?

A remote timer on ebay should do the trick if it doesn't?

I've seen timelapse from the K20D on youtube

Comment by Algernon posted on Time Lapse Video at 26/04/2012 - 10:38

Algernon
Being an archaeologist he was also having some drawings done
on the walls of a cave!

Comment by Algernon posted on Wedding dilemma... at 26/04/2012 - 09:42

Algernon
Frogherder wrote:
So you have a pretty pink handbag for the camera, then have to tuck the other 'box' containing the lenses under your arm - eh.

My wife might, just might, go for the 1st option (apart from she doesn't like pink, and what does she do with her 'actual' handbag), but I for one wouldn't see the 'box' even leaving the house.


Bernard
Further reinforces my thoughts that this is just a design excercise if it's a small system it should all go into one bag

Go on ladies buy two.... Your worth it! (..... Ducks!.....)

Comment by Algernon posted on So what can we expect from the Q? at 25/04/2012 - 14:28

Algernon
Is that the photographic equivalent of a Concept Car!

Who would buy a camera case that has a padlock on it!

I doubt if even a suitcase with padlocks would sell

Comment by Algernon posted on So what can we expect from the Q? at 25/04/2012 - 09:06

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo