All Forum Comments
Comment by Algernon posted on How to fitting VIVITAR 28-200mm f3.5/5.3 MC MACRO PK/PK-A Lens to Pentax K-r? at 14/09/2012 - 08:18
AWB should work OK on the K-5.
To WB the RAW file the scaffold tube should be neutral grey.
You may have to try several points on the tube because it
does vary quite a bit.
The whites are burnt out and you are not really going
to recover much from that picture.
To WB the RAW file the scaffold tube should be neutral grey.
You may have to try several points on the tube because it
does vary quite a bit.
The whites are burnt out and you are not really going
to recover much from that picture.
Comment by Algernon posted on Correct the pink! at 14/09/2012 - 08:01
I saw it on the Pentax K-5 II spec. but it doesn't impress
me enough to make me upgrade from the K-5
me enough to make me upgrade from the K-5
Comment by Algernon posted on Trillion frames a second !! at 13/09/2012 - 13:10
Samsung have FULL HD on their cameras
I would expect a legal challenge HD is probably a trademark :
Why not call them iPod coated or just Digital
I would expect a legal challenge HD is probably a trademark :
Why not call them iPod coated or just Digital
Comment by Algernon posted on 'SMC' to 'HD' potential marketing disaster? at 13/09/2012 - 08:57
Terrific shots especially the first.... just like standing
in front of the car
in front of the car
Comment by Algernon posted on Italian Grand Prix at 13/09/2012 - 08:06
The RH site does have a link back to the original PF post
in which they think it's faked pf_link
I can't understand why they have used HD for the name of the
coating. I thought that was a trademark of the movie companies?
It's not going to attract any attention anyway it's so well known.
-
in which they think it's faked pf_link
I can't understand why they have used HD for the name of the
coating. I thought that was a trademark of the movie companies?
It's not going to attract any attention anyway it's so well known.
-
Comment by Algernon posted on DA 560mm at 12/09/2012 - 20:00
Don wrote:
It's shown here collapsed and the pics came fromAlgernon wrote:
I wasn't sure about the waterproofing, but it's confirmed
that it is. It doesn't collapse though.
Pentax did patent such a beast.. and there were photos of the prototype 560 that did appear to be collapsable... so do not rule it out yet..I wasn't sure about the waterproofing, but it's confirmed
that it is. It doesn't collapse though.
the same forum that now says it doesn't collapse and it's
not shown collapsed on the latest photos?
ricehigh_link
-
Comment by Algernon posted on DA 560mm at 12/09/2012 - 19:31
it's not usually a problem.