Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
This is a Takumar, but you can see the 3 screws. On this
lens just the beauty ring needs removing to access them.
The A Series doesn't have a beauty ring so the front
might be held by grubsrews into the body.

http://retinarescue.com/pentax50mmf1.4.html

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Anybody used Harrow Technical for repair? at 25/01/2013 - 08:37

Algernon
I've never taken a Pentax-A 35mm 2.8 lens apart, but normally
when you remove the front, there are 3 small grubcrews that grip
the focusing ring. It sounds like they have worked loose and
just need tightening...... should only take about 10 mins.

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Anybody used Harrow Technical for repair? at 25/01/2013 - 08:22

Algernon
There must be something wrong with it for that price
It's at least £100 less than it's worth

Comment by Algernon posted on Alright, who bought it! at 25/01/2013 - 08:16

Algernon
There seems to be a fairly serious bug in the Pentax software...... why am I surprised no ones noticed it (unless it's part of the SDHC specification)..... You tick a box in the menu for it to remember the file no. and it does until you put in a card that has a higher file number and even if the prefix letters are different (something like Nikon1001.jpg) it will go 1 number higher, but with the Pentax prefix. It's a pain if your using two cameras and even worse with an Eye-Fi Card which you can't reformat, because it contains programs used by Eye-Fi.

I've got some files on my PC where the same numbers have been used about 4 times

What I do now is start again from 0001.jpg preceded by a letter A B C D E etc which is preceded by the camera name _K5 so the new file will start _K5B0001.JPG I then try to keep other files off that card. My next sequence will start with _K5C0001.JPG

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Oh Bugger... at 25/01/2013 - 08:06

Algernon
The Range stock all kinds of mounting materials.

Comment by Algernon posted on Enlarging photos to hang on the wall, what's the best size please? at 24/01/2013 - 12:54

Algernon
All good, but I like the waterfall the best

Comment by Algernon posted on Snow in Oldham at 24/01/2013 - 07:59

Algernon
How much was it?

Comment by Algernon posted on Alright, who bought it! at 24/01/2013 - 07:57

Algernon
ASa wrote:
Interesting, I'm currently using the CR1 in my ME Super, and so far so good. In the manual for Super A it is specified that it can take two 1,5V batteries or one 3V lithium battery.
I have a feeling that this isn't stated previously due to the fact that lithium batteries didn't really exist commonly until the release of the Super A. But not to start an argue with it, if you say so I do believe it's not recommended. I'll let you know if anything happens to my beloved ME Super!
The Lithium batteries were brought out around the time that the
ME and MX were released. Silver had rocketed to a sky high price
and they were a cheap alternative for some cameras, but not
recommended for Pentax. One of the cameras (ME or MX) was
supplied with Alkaline batteries. It says so in the manual.

Strangely when silver came back down in price they started to
charge more for Litium, because of the greater capacity.

-

Comment by Algernon posted on Best Film body to get. at 21/01/2013 - 20:10

Algernon
I bet the people who bought Samsung 12-24mm's from Dixons for
£199 are still laughing!

The same lens with a Pentax badge is currently £739 at SRS



-

Comment by Algernon posted on best current deal on K30? at 21/01/2013 - 16:52

Algernon
Quite a lot of people bought GX20's when they were being sold
off by the likes of Jacobs for £300 3 1/2 years ago and almost
got there money back 3 years later when they sold them as SH

SRS are currently selling K20D's on ebay for £229
A GX-20 would only be slightly cheaper.

Comment by Algernon posted on best current deal on K30? at 21/01/2013 - 14:51

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo