All Forum Comments
Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax Full Frame Comment at 19/09/2013 - 19:07
Unusual for Tesco's to make a mistake that way round
They make plenty the other way
Looks like they spotted it
They do have an offer on any 4 for 3 on bottled beer which means
their own 'Simply Golden Ale' 4.5% 500ml (Marstons) comes out
at about £4.50 for 4....... I didn't buy any because I'm
on a Diet of 'Tangle Foot' at present
-
Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 19/09/2013 - 19:02
ex Pentax users who jumped ship to the Nikon D600 during it's
short 12 month life only to find that it has problems and has
to be replaced with the D610
Also where can I buy an old D600 with the £100 burning a hole
in my pocket
Sorry another question?... Will the Pentax FF if it ever comes
out also have a life of 12 months?
Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax Full Frame Comment at 19/09/2013 - 18:44
perhaps the reason for the price near-parity has something to do with the 80-320 being the best Pentax ~100-300 which is film compatible (both in image circle terms and because it has an aperture ring)?
just a guess.
-
Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax 55-300mm or Pentax f 80-320mm ? at 19/09/2013 - 13:56
now that they have been taken over by Zenit
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax Full Frame Comment at 19/09/2013 - 13:53
we are more compatible with our old junk!
--
Comment by Algernon posted on Using Old Pentax Lenses on Newer Pentax Cameras at 19/09/2013 - 09:39
-
Comment by Algernon posted on Hello Pentax Fanatics! at 19/09/2013 - 08:06
Comment by Algernon posted on K5 2S moire-Just for the record at 18/09/2013 - 15:59
on more technical forums and blogs for anyone who is interested.
Incidentally the Pentax K100D had a very weak anti-alias
filter and suffered badly from moire..... nice example here.
--
Comment by Algernon posted on K5 2S moire-Just for the record at 18/09/2013 - 11:41
filters were put on the cameras so that it wasn't coming from
there. Remove it and there is a big risk that it will return,
making it unsuitable for professional architectural use. which
is all I said in the first place, but people seem to want to
make it into something bigger.
I know what you mean by the size submitted, but the fact
is that no one can put back what isn't there, because
it's been removed by moire. It's also a poor reflection
on the photographer that he can't do his own PP. What
does he do ring the magazine and say I know you want
this 800 pixels wide, but I can't reduce it without
jaggies, so I'll send you the full RAW and see if
you can do it any better
--
Comment by Algernon posted on K5 2S moire-Just for the record at 18/09/2013 - 10:04


I would be so mad I'd buy a Sony if I'd bought a D600
-