Pentax Ricoh future
This topic has a poll - login to enter
Posted 22/05/2012 - 23:09
Link
Smeggypants wrote:
The only way is to use the Live View Magnified ( which makes composing the pic almost impossible
I shoot quite a lot of my pics this way .... so not too impossible ::
The only way is to use the Live View Magnified ( which makes composing the pic almost impossible
- -
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Posted 22/05/2012 - 23:13
Link
Cameras and sand...that goes against the grain, but impressive anyway.
Best regards, John
Posted 22/05/2012 - 23:24
Link
judderman62 wrote:
With a DOF of only a few millimetres it's easy to move the camera when going back to 1x view to compose.
Smeggypants wrote:
The only way is to use the Live View Magnified ( which makes composing the pic almost impossible
I shoot quite a lot of my pics this way .... so not too impossible ::The only way is to use the Live View Magnified ( which makes composing the pic almost impossible
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 22/05/2012 - 23:31
Link
most of my shots ar eon a tripod so while I guess theoretically that could still happen I think I'm probably still getting decently accurate focus.
Guess it depends on what/how we are shooting
Guess it depends on what/how we are shooting
- -
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Mike
Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Posted 23/05/2012 - 01:01
Link
tripod there's no probs
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 23/05/2012 - 09:45
Link
davidstorm wrote:
Regards
David
It's well known that focusing accurately (at about 25x FL = Lens test distances)is not possible without using a focusing rack. linkAlgernon wrote:
Accurate manual focus on the K-5 at around 1M is impossible
I'm not sure what you mean by this Algi - I have no difficulty manually focusing my K-5 at any distances. I use it for Macro, Wildlife and all other manner of things where I focus manually. The viewfinder is good and there is a focus confirmation if you need it. Could you explain a little further what you mean?Accurate manual focus on the K-5 at around 1M is impossible
Regards
David
At first I thought I would be OK focusing with magnified LV and then moving back and forth on a small Novoflex rack until I found the points fore and aft where the screen went in and out of focus, and then take the centre point, but it didn't change at all going +/- 60mm so I had to try it on the monster link which allows an enormous 15" of movement. I still had to move a long way for the LV image to go OOF.... the 3" screen resolution must not be good enough. That was still a bit messy
What I do now (for lens testing) using a laptop and Eye-Fi card is focus with magnified LV. Put masking tape on the lens focus ring to stop it moving. Take a shot. Take further shots with the rack moved back and forth +40mm +20mm -20mm -40mm.
Pick the best shot say +20mm and then take a further 3/4 shots bracketed in 10mm increments for each aperture either side of +20mm. Pick the best for final comparison. This also picks up any errors due to focus shift on stopping down.
It sounds a lot but it's actually fairly quick because I only focus the lens once for the whole test and then it's just a case of quickly turning the knob on the focus rack and taking each shot.
The distances +40mm +20mm -20mm -40mm aren't really that critical what matters is that the camera is moved a bit between shots. The target could be moved instead which means a focus rack is not required.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 23/05/2012 - 21:16
Link
I understand now Algi. I didn't realise you were referring to testing lenses - that is a whole different kettle of fish to just using a camera for everyday shots. Thank you for the explanation.
I was referring to everyday use and comparing this with my other cameras (K-m & K-x) which are more difficult to focus manually than the K-5.
Regards
David
I was referring to everyday use and comparing this with my other cameras (K-m & K-x) which are more difficult to focus manually than the K-5.
Regards
David
Posted 24/05/2012 - 07:06
Link
Haworth wrote:
Well that's mildly interesting, but the key word is bottom. I think the only thing that can be said with certainty is that having those images buried at the bottom shows the advertising agency gets it.Shaky wrote:
The volume segment of the market would undoubtedly prefer to buy a camera associated with sun, sea and sand, or say family and children, or cuddly pets.
Needless to say mud and the pouring rain are complete turn offs.
If you check out the link below and scroll down to the bottom of the page, the publicity pics are obviously aiming at something different to mud and rain. The volume segment of the market would undoubtedly prefer to buy a camera associated with sun, sea and sand, or say family and children, or cuddly pets.
Needless to say mud and the pouring rain are complete turn offs.
On the the other hand the main image seen at the top prominently is of the K30 seemingly covered in water droplets; the obvious inference is that it is raining.
I'm open to the possibility that Pentax's dismal marketing track record can be turned around. But I see only the most tenuous evidence of that at this time.
Posted 24/05/2012 - 07:40
Link
Haworth wrote:
Pictures of young people and familiy on beach with K-30
Plenty of fun, sand and smiles there!
All now gone!Pictures of young people and familiy on beach with K-30
Plenty of fun, sand and smiles there!
On a whim I went back to have another look, but now the "fun, sand and smiles" has now been completely scrapped in favour of more drizzle. Check it out yourself.
You can't make this stuff up -- LMAO.
Posted 24/05/2012 - 09:53
Link
Shaky wrote:
On a whim I went back to have another look, but now the "fun, sand and smiles" has now been completely scrapped in favour of more drizzle. Check it out yourself.
You can't make this stuff up -- LMAO.
Indeed - it does seem like one step forward then one step back. One can only ponder at the reasons for pulling those images.
Haworth wrote:
Pictures of young people and familiy on beach with K-30
Plenty of fun, sand and smiles there!
All now gone!Pictures of young people and familiy on beach with K-30
Plenty of fun, sand and smiles there!
On a whim I went back to have another look, but now the "fun, sand and smiles" has now been completely scrapped in favour of more drizzle. Check it out yourself.
You can't make this stuff up -- LMAO.
Posted 24/05/2012 - 11:34
Link
johnriley wrote:
Weather Resistance is a major plus for us. We're not afraid to get out in the rain and it's great to know that the cameras and lenses can take it.
I have had my K7 drenched in sea water with no ill effect and been out in a rain storm with the D700 with no ill effect. This is also an example of not worrying about the consequences of getting a shot linkWeather Resistance is a major plus for us. We're not afraid to get out in the rain and it's great to know that the cameras and lenses can take it.
I do think that Pentax need to push other features rather than advertise splash proof/weatherproof as the main attraction.
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 24/05/2012 - 11:59
Link
Haworth wrote:
One can only ponder at the reasons for pulling those images.
In fairness one should probably differentiate between PR shots that publications would use in product announcements and write-ups, and the images ultimately used in advertising campaigns.One can only ponder at the reasons for pulling those images.
Even so getting rid of the beach shots entirely is utterly bizarre; maybe it a cultural thing, a Japanese appeal to photography under extreme Endurance gameshow style hardships
Anyway, to finish off my pro bono marketing advice here’s what I would do; get some creative types to think about how to structure a campaign highlighting the excellent Pentax colour.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6794 posts
17 years
Nottingham
The volume segment of the market would undoubtedly prefer to buy a camera associated with sun, sea and sand, or say family and children, or cuddly pets.
Needless to say mud and the pouring rain are complete turn offs.
Pictures of young people and familiy on beach with K-30
Plenty of fun, sand and smiles there!