K10D - Wish list?

old timer
Posted 27/01/2007 - 13:19 Link
Quote:
....and it has no option to set a fractional power output.

In an alternate thread I posted about flash compensation, the received wisdom was that flash compensation was achieved by changing the power of the flash output!
If that is not the case, then I would go for an option to change the flash power to eg 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 power
So does it, or doen't it?
Graham
Keep up the good work
Graham

I'll think of something someday.
Mannesty
Posted 27/01/2007 - 15:37 Link
old_timer,

The AF140C ring flash has no option to set a manual fractional power output. It has two TTL settings F5.6 & F22 which will set some (not all - refer to AF140C manual) cameras to those two apertures automatically. It still relies on the camera's body to use TTL flash control (quench). The only other setting on this particular ring flash, is manual (full output).

K10D does not support, TTL flash control (it lacks the sensor in the mirror box), therefore the gun must be used in manual mode. In my testing of this combination, the AF140C mounted on K10D, the AF140C only ever produces 100% output, irrespective of which AF140C switch position is used.

Regards,
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
johnriley
Posted 27/01/2007 - 17:14 Link
But it does work and produces excellent results in manual setting. Apertures as small as f32 may be necessary for very close work.
Best regards, John
Mannesty
Posted 28/01/2007 - 08:36 Link
Quote:
But it does work and produces excellent results in manual setting. Apertures as small as f32 may be necessary for very close work.
Absolutely true. I think it is arguably the best ring flash available for any macro work.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
spbatt
Posted 29/01/2007 - 16:51 Link
... back on the 'Wishlist' subject...

I wish that in future PENTAX DLSRs the LCD screen/monitor will be sealed around the edges to stop the ingress of dust. It's quite a small 'wish' for now but at the weekend I was viewing the screen on my K10D in full sunlight and couldn't quite believe how much dust had got in behind it. I now feel the need to seal the screen myself before more dust gets in.

Anyone else notice this or is it just me and my K10D (and that maybe I have a house full of rampant dust particles)?

Regards!

Simon
Ammonyte
Posted 29/01/2007 - 17:51 Link
Simon,

I'm surprised, given the effort Pentax have made to seal this body!
Tim the Ammonyte
--------------
K10D & sundry toys
http://www.ammonyte.com/photos.html
spbatt
Posted 29/01/2007 - 18:34 Link
I was very surprised.

I am thinking that regular enthusiastic cleaning of the surface with a micro fibre cloth (that maybe was a little dusty although not obviously so) could be the main culprit... I will be more wary from now on.

Not a huge problem afterall… just wasn't expecting to see that cursed dust there!
George Lazarette
Posted 29/01/2007 - 19:35 Link
I wonder if rubbing with the cloth has induced a charge of static electricity which is attracting the dust.

Might have been worse. A huge genie could have suddenly appeared......

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
spbatt
Posted 29/01/2007 - 20:56 Link


An 'in-camera' Genie is now on my wishlist for PENTAX's next DSLR. Think how useful that could be... the mind boggles...

If the Genie granted me 3 wishes:

1) To be as good as Lartigue and Cartier-Bresson in one!

2) For PENTAX to buy CANON in a hostile takeover!

3) To have £10 million so I could indulge my hobby fully!

I'll probably think of 3 better wishes in another 10 minutes.
Mongoose
Posted 29/01/2007 - 21:28 Link
lets see......... Genie wishes really ought to be things money can't buy, what should I have


1. a pocket sized device which renders all flash P&S flash units within a 50m radius of my position inoperable for 10 minutes.

2. one of those pieces of telepathic paper the Doctor has in the new Dr Who, so it can turn into a photographers pass whenever anyone questions my right to shoot in an area.

3. A full height tripod which is as stable as a rock, folds down to slip into a shirt pocket and weighs nothing
Pwynnej
Posted 30/01/2007 - 08:23 Link
Seriously...

I would want

MZ-S Styling and ergonomics
The same chip Nikon have in the D2Xs (CMOS 12MP)
Integrated battery grip (not separate - I have big hands) and a flash socket..


What I would love

DA* 16-400 f1.4 within the same dimensions as the 16-45
Mongoose
Posted 30/01/2007 - 10:19 Link
it has just come to my attention that to plug in the wired shutter release you have to open the sealed door on the left hand side of the camera, exposing the data and power sockets to the elements.

What if you want to use a cable release in the rain?

IMO the cable release port should have its own door and should seal to the release itself.

so far this is just about the only design quibble I've been able to come up with, and its a small one.
MattMatic
Posted 30/01/2007 - 10:20 Link
Quote:
What if you want to use a cable release in the rain?
Use the Infrared remote
Matt
Mongoose
Posted 30/01/2007 - 11:27 Link
Quote:
Quote:
What if you want to use a cable release in the rain?
Use the Infrared remote
Matt
like I said, its a small one
Delgado
Posted 09/02/2007 - 22:10 Link
I would like to have a custom setting that allowed the RAW switch to just give me RAW or JPEG rather than JPEG alone or RAW & JPEG. I'm not suggesting Pentax ditches the RAW & JPEG option, just add the third choice please via custom functions of RAW or JPEG alone when toggling the switch.

I would also like a multiple exposure setting that did not impose any limits. With the LX I was able to disengage the film winding mechanism and keep cycling the shutter with a motor drive for sequences of 100 or more exposures.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo