Here at last! - DA* 60-250

piotro
Posted 25/04/2009 - 11:46 Link
And bonus, same stuff with DA 55-300 for comparison.

f/5.6 crop
Comment Image


f/8.0 crop
Comment Image
Edited by piotro: 25/04/2009 - 11:47
Mike-P
Posted 25/04/2009 - 11:55 Link
piotro wrote:
And bonus, same stuff with DA 55-300 for comparison.

So is the 60-250mm worth 4 times the price for weather sealing and HSM .. personally from the look of those I would say not.
Besides, my 55-300mm sits nicely in my bag along with the 12-24mm, DA* 16-50mm and Tamron macro.
johnriley
Posted 25/04/2009 - 11:56 Link
If you focus on the sign and take images at various apertures the sharpness of the wall behind will vary because the depth of field will change.
Best regards, John
piotro
Posted 25/04/2009 - 12:08 Link
johnriley wrote:
If you focus on the sign and take images at various apertures the sharpness of the wall behind will vary because the depth of field will change.
, I do realise that John, I was talking series of photos at the same aperture.
Just did a test with focus chart and... 250mm, f/4.0 defocusing manually in one direction, getting focus via AF, defocusing manually in other direction, back in focus with AF, and one shot shows front focus, other back focus, or maybe it is K10D... (and K20D nearly 4 weeks with pentax and still no news).
Edited by piotro: 25/04/2009 - 12:12
piotro
Posted 25/04/2009 - 12:56 Link
Repeated focus chart test few times and conclusion is, with 60-250 if first defocused lens towards the infinity, it has the tendency to back focussing, if defocussed first towards the min focussing distance, then it shows front focus. It still could be the K10D (or firmware 1.3) way of dealing with SDM, tried same test with 55-300 and it doesn't show that issue.
Edited by piotro: 25/04/2009 - 13:02
Mike-P
Posted 25/04/2009 - 15:11 Link
piotro wrote:
It still could be the K10D (or firmware 1.3) way of dealing with SDM, tried same test with 55-300 and it doesn't show that issue.
If that were the case everyone with a K10D and DA*16-50mm up to DA* 300mm would be screaming blue murder (me included).
Greytop
Posted 25/04/2009 - 16:08 Link
Not long got back from SRS... the good news is that it was a rouge sample.

The one that SRS replaced it with is much much better at f/4....
Now I'm a happy bunny

Thanks again to the guys at SRS
Regards Huw

flickr
Mannesty
Posted 25/04/2009 - 18:41 Link
Glad you got it sorted, good to meet you.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
RadamFG
Posted 25/04/2009 - 18:54 Link
What is a "rouge sample":

Greytop wrote:
Not long got back from SRS... the good news is that it was a rouge sample.

The one that SRS replaced it with is much much better at f/4....
Now I'm a happy bunny

Thanks again to the guys at SRS
leytono
Posted 25/04/2009 - 19:28 Link
Would guess its meant to be rogue

Heard of grey imports, but never rouge ones
Edited by leytono: 25/04/2009 - 19:29
shim
Posted 25/04/2009 - 19:52 Link
Black..... Silver..... and now Rouge

shim
Mike-P
Posted 25/04/2009 - 19:54 Link
Mannesty wrote:
Glad you got it sorted, good to meet you.
Hope you made sure they didnt give you the duff one to take back to Spain
RichardDay
Posted 25/04/2009 - 20:59 Link
shim wrote:
Black..... Silver..... and now Rouge

shim
You lot are terrible, very pithy!
Best regards
Richard Day

Profile - link - (click on About for equipment profile) - My Flickr site - link
Posted 25/04/2009 - 21:07 Link
Hi folks, well I picked mine up this afternoon from you know where. I'll post some pics here for you to pick over in due time.

I have an F70-210 and a DA200 too so hopefully I'll find time to do some comparisons soon.

I'll try and post a few pics from the pre-production sample too, but probably in a seperate thread to avoid confusion.

hope everyone enjoys their new lens.

my mrs is suggesting I should be sentenced to some hard time helping round the house for buying this one, so I hope it's worth it

cheers
piotro
Posted 25/04/2009 - 22:16 Link
Mike-P wrote:
So is the 60-250mm worth 4 times the price for weather sealing and HSM .. personally from the look of those I would say not.
Problem with 55-300 is that it is loosing sharpness towards the edges quite significantly, of course using f/8.0 - f/11.0 helps (but doesn't nivelate) on the cost of slower shutter. 60-250 is much more consistent (not a surprise anyway for this price).
SDM not HSM, Pentax still doesn't do HSM.

Small, bit compressed example pic taken with 60-250:
https://www.pentaxuser.com/photo/Approach-6177
Edited by piotro: 25/04/2009 - 22:39

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo