Here at last! - DA* 60-250

scottthehat
Posted 25/04/2009 - 22:19 Link
whats the difference between sdm and hsm
just keep snapping,

https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson


http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/


CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
piotro
Posted 25/04/2009 - 22:35 Link
AS far I'm aware Pentax SDM is a micromotor, with some gear to drive the focussing system. HSM is a ring motor. Some people believe HSM is faster (I guess as it may have lower inertia "on the back" (?)), and being more reliable due to less mechanics inside (?), both are silent anyway , I wouldn't care what letters "sit inside" as long as it works, is fast and silent, why not .
Edited by piotro: 25/04/2009 - 22:41
Greytop
Posted 25/04/2009 - 22:37 Link
Nice to meet you too Peter (Mannesty), sorry for the typo chaps, yes I meant 'rogue'

Mike, no lucky for Peter he got there before me

Seriously though thanks to Chris again at SRS, what a nice bunch those guys are
Regards Huw

flickr
Edited by Greytop: 26/04/2009 - 09:23
scottthehat
Posted 25/04/2009 - 22:37 Link
cheers piotro, learn something new everyday,
just keep snapping,

https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson


http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/


CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Mannesty
Posted 25/04/2009 - 22:46 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
Glad you got it sorted, good to meet you.
Hope you made sure they didn't give you the duff one to take back to Spain
No, mine was safely back in its box before greytop turned up with his duffer. I only took a few test shots with mine, at f4 and 250mm of course, and I was very impressed by it but I've not seen the images on screen yet. In camera they look good.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Greytop
Posted 26/04/2009 - 09:26 Link
Mine is like night and day at f/4 compared to the first one. I've not seen any other reports of a bad copy so I guess I got the 'joker' of the pack this time
Regards Huw

flickr
Edited by Greytop: 26/04/2009 - 09:26
Pwynnej
Posted 26/04/2009 - 15:18 Link
shim wrote:
Black..... Silver..... and now Rouge

shim
Next special edition of K-m

The Claret or Burgundy, or the 'Olive Green that's been in battle Red' edition
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
RobE17
Posted 26/04/2009 - 16:34 Link
Good Afternoon all,

Mine arrived on Friday after the long wait

Here's an image shot at 250mm @ F4, ISO 100 and 1/180 with Daylight white setting on the K20D and no changes to EV. This image is straight out of the camera and converted to JPEG from DNG and it looks ok to me.

[IMG]http://i477.photobucket.com/albums/rr139/RobbieB_album/IMGP0850.jpg[/IMG]
leytono
Posted 26/04/2009 - 17:03 Link
That looks more like it my credit card is making its way back out again now (went into hiding after those first examples)
pschlute
Posted 26/04/2009 - 19:13 Link
Well I am happy with mine. Picked it up from the post office on Saturday These were all taken in the garden; processed with Silkypix Emphatic Sharp setting, and downsized with USM 80/0.6/1.

The first three are at f4.0, and the last two at f4.5.

Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment Image
Oggy
Posted 26/04/2009 - 20:52 Link
Does this story seem depressingly familiar - see also the DA* 16-50. When they are good they are stunningly good, and when they are bad---

Is it about time someone gave Pentax a kick in the QCs?
Comment Image
hefty1
Posted 26/04/2009 - 21:59 Link
Epithet Man wrote:
Can somebody please confirm the minimum focus distance for this lens (at both ends of focal length if it differs)?

EM
1.1 metres (either end)
Joining the Q
pschlute
Posted 26/04/2009 - 22:48 Link
Something I have just noticed. When turning the zoom ring from about "235" mm to 250 mm , I can see very minimal movement on the zoom extension, but it does move. However, through the viewfinder, there appears to be no change in zoom length this final bit !

Anyone else confirm what they see ?
Daniel Bridge
Posted 26/04/2009 - 23:47 Link
Glad to see the recession is having little effect around here!

Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Mannesty
Posted 27/04/2009 - 08:21 Link
Daniel Bridge wrote:
Glad to see the recession is having little effect around here!

Dan
Recession, what recession?

I think of it as saving my children from wasting their inheritance on unnecessary items that they probably wouldn't use. I can do that just as easily as they can.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo