Do you have a style?

Pentaxophile
Posted 10/11/2010 - 14:55 Link
On a recent thread someone has said:
Quote:
Your pictures are probably snaps unless you have developed a unique distinctive style. Have a look through the people on here and see if you can spot their images without looking at the names? Not that many are distinctive or unique. (I don't mean the subject matter either as that's often a dead giveaway).
Do you have a style?

Post a series of about 3-5 pictures which you feel demonstrate your style.... or the style you aspire to
dougf8
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:33 Link
Can I nominate ? While I look through my snaps.

I think Camus has a distinctive style.

https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/dream--recent-wanderings-23753
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 10/11/2010 - 16:36
Gwyn
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:40 Link
I'd nominate Lilly has having a very distinctive style.
She hasn't been around lately, but I have always admired her photography.

I don't have a style.
Pentaxophile
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:43 Link
I agree re Camus and Lilly. And I also nominate Jaromir: https://www.pentaxuser.com/user/jaromir-6721/gallery

I can think of several others too, but I'll keep it at that for now.

No-one want to blow their own trumpet? It doesn't have to mean that you are terribly self satisfied about having your own style, perhaps just a particular type of picture you take from time to time which you would like to focus more on?
Edited by Pentaxophile: 10/11/2010 - 16:47
dougf8
Posted 10/11/2010 - 16:52 Link
Nope I'm an odd snapper!!!!

[IMG]http://i740.photobucket.com/albums/xx49/df8/style.jpg[/IMG]
Lurking is shirking.!
DrOrloff
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:03 Link
There are a number of photographers who I can easily recognise for their style within a particular genre. There is one who I have been able to identify regardless of genre.
Pentaxophile
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:05 Link
You're being too modest Doug, even on that image board I can see certain pre-occupations emerging, and a penchant for strong colour! Being a visual magpie is a style in itself
Edited by Pentaxophile: 10/11/2010 - 17:07
TOZZA27
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:06 Link
Bwlchmawr has a brilliant style - spot one of his shots immediately !

Womble has a style of his own

i-Berg has his own style

I don`t think I do unless it`s staying within 500 yards of home for most of the year`s output !

Tony
K20D,*istD ( now a dedicated M42 digital ),K100D,MZ5N,P50,ME Super,Spotmatic 1000,Spotmatic,ESII,ES,H2.18-55 II,18-55,75-300 FAJ,35-80 FA,80-200 F,28-105 FA,Sigma 24-70 AF Aspherical,Sigma 28-300 Hyperzoom , Praotor II 500 M42,Centon 500mm mirror,and a few Pentax M42 Taks,super-Taks,smc Taks,A and M lenses.Benbo trekker,7dayshop monopod and a Lowepro rucksack.

I am now on Flickr which is nice !
bwlchmawr
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:48 Link
TOZZA27 wrote:
Bwlchmawr has a brilliant style - spot one of his shots immediately !

Tony
Yeah, the trouble is, Tony, it's a style based on rot, grunge, rust, decay and delapidation. Not a great style to be known for. And stuck in a scabby rut.

Now look at Kris's stuff. Not only does he take pictures of different things in different places but he still uses film (rememeber that?) and rings the changes with large format cameras (obviously not viewable here) and experiments with equipment like a ten bob Russian TLR.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
TOZZA27
Posted 10/11/2010 - 17:59 Link


Now you are just being modest - scabby rut ? I think not sir !

And anyway - one day all that rot,grunge,decay and dilapidation will have ceased to exist finally , and without you there will be no memories of it for generations to come with their throwaway soiety and their plastic world.

Get on with it and stop moaning !!

A Fan
K20D,*istD ( now a dedicated M42 digital ),K100D,MZ5N,P50,ME Super,Spotmatic 1000,Spotmatic,ESII,ES,H2.18-55 II,18-55,75-300 FAJ,35-80 FA,80-200 F,28-105 FA,Sigma 24-70 AF Aspherical,Sigma 28-300 Hyperzoom , Praotor II 500 M42,Centon 500mm mirror,and a few Pentax M42 Taks,super-Taks,smc Taks,A and M lenses.Benbo trekker,7dayshop monopod and a Lowepro rucksack.

I am now on Flickr which is nice !
bwlchmawr
Posted 10/11/2010 - 18:07 Link
TOZZA27 wrote:
:Get on with it and stop moaning !!

A Fan
Point taken, Tony, but before I shut up (for a while) may I direct readers to the Gallery where there reside some outstanding and distinctive photographers, several of them from non-English speaking countries, whose work is highly distinctive.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
womble
Posted 10/11/2010 - 19:31 Link
I can usually spot John Riley's entries in the weekly competition from the thumbnails alone. Andrew's images stand out too, for me anyway. I must admit I find myself a bit bored with many of my images hence my attempts at street photography in NYC and "lomo" style images with the TLR (although my Lubitel is much better quality than the modern Lomo ones).

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
CWyatt
Posted 10/11/2010 - 19:47 Link
Interestingly, I was thinking about this myself after I saw Michael Schlegel's work. I don't think you can get more distinctive than this:
http://www.michaelschlegel.com/

This also reminds me of a Cartier-Bresson comment. He said Robert Capa told him he was in danger of being pigeon-holed as a Surrealist photographer. Capa told him to do whatever he liked, but the label was to be 'photojournalist', 'and Capa was very sound'.
'The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera' - Dorothea Lange

My Photography Portfolio

Facebook page
Edited by CWyatt: 10/11/2010 - 19:47
Stuey
Posted 10/11/2010 - 20:35 Link
Style is not a word I am usually associated with
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link
TOZZA27
Posted 10/11/2010 - 20:43 Link
I tripped over one once !!
K20D,*istD ( now a dedicated M42 digital ),K100D,MZ5N,P50,ME Super,Spotmatic 1000,Spotmatic,ESII,ES,H2.18-55 II,18-55,75-300 FAJ,35-80 FA,80-200 F,28-105 FA,Sigma 24-70 AF Aspherical,Sigma 28-300 Hyperzoom , Praotor II 500 M42,Centon 500mm mirror,and a few Pentax M42 Taks,super-Taks,smc Taks,A and M lenses.Benbo trekker,7dayshop monopod and a Lowepro rucksack.

I am now on Flickr which is nice !

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo