Billingham

Anvh
Posted 30/05/2011 - 16:22 Link
I'm thinking of buying a new shoulder-bag just for the K5 + DA*16-50 + DA*50-135 + AF540FGZ and my eyes are on Billingham now because crumpler don't make one that i like and neither does Lowe.

So i'm curious of some of you have or have tried the f/1.4 bag because that one seems to be just larger enough.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
jules
Posted 31/05/2011 - 06:53 Link
I too love a good Billingham Stefan
The only downside I see from this one is it doesn't appear to have a grab handle, which can be handy at times. Judging from all the Pics on the Billingham Site, I cannot see one on it anyway,that might be a bind? Someone correct me if I'm wrong? I would personally go for a Hadley Pro, which are just that little bit slimmer I think and fit to the Side of your body better...
I like the look of the "07" series but the cost is excessive even for the small one in my opinion
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Edited by jules: 31/05/2011 - 06:59
johnriley
Posted 31/05/2011 - 07:38 Link
The Hadley Pro is the perfect choice, an all-weather bag that is slim and unobtrusive, plenty roomy enough for camera and several lenses plus accessories and has a design that has no wasted space.
Best regards, John
gartmore
Posted 31/05/2011 - 08:09 Link
I have been using an enormous Billingham bag for the past twenty or so years. Its actually too big because when I really fill it up its too heavy to carry!

However, it still looks as good as new whereas my three year old Lowe is starting to look a bit grubby and tatty.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
jules
Posted 31/05/2011 - 10:18 Link
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Anvh
Posted 31/05/2011 - 19:34 Link
Thanks Jules,
Indeed the 7's looks very nice, i also like the darker colour of them, they aren't that flashy.
Also thanks for the photo's that was really handy but still like to know from first hand if it will fit the gear i named.
It's quite hard to find billingham's over here you see so can't try it out

The hadly pro looks also good but i like the single larger pocket at the front to be honest.

johnriley wrote:
The Hadley Pro is the perfect choice, an all-weather bag that is slim and unobtrusive, plenty roomy enough for camera and several lenses plus accessories and has a design that has no wasted space.
gartmore wrote:
However, it still looks as good as new whereas my three year old Lowe is starting to look a bit grubby and tatty.
That's why i'm looking at Billingham

I also have a huge crumpler bag that's to heavy when fully packed and it's too big to carry around in the city or to concerts.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Anvh
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:04 Link
What about this bag?
I know not a Billingham... but it does fit to my needs.
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-20-pinestone-shoulder-bag.a...
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 31/05/2011 - 22:05
jules
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:36 Link
Thats close to my my current fave Stefan I don't own it however, I like the Retrospective 10, I would think it big enough?
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.a...

I think the 20 is a bit square looking and there would be a lot of space left at the top of the bag?
10: ID: 12” W x 9.5” H x 6” D
20: ID: 12” W x 11.75” H x 6” D

Your 50-135 is only about half that...
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Edited by jules: 31/05/2011 - 22:37
Anvh
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:42 Link
Maybe but don't forget that the flash is actually bigger than the DA*50-135...
I know it sounds silly but the flash was actually the problem with most bags i tested

This photo doesn't look to positive...
Comment Image
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 31/05/2011 - 22:44
jules
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:45 Link
Without being taken the wrong way you have 9.5" to play with there!
And it folds up too
It gets worse I'm off:arrow:
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
jules
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:48 Link
On the right of that pic above is a 70-200 AFSVR, I think your'e gear would fit but if your'e not sure maybe the 20 would be better?
That said a D300 is a lot bigger than a K5.
Flash on the other side and the 50-135 on the left...?
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Edited by jules: 31/05/2011 - 22:53
Anvh
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:55 Link
jules wrote:

Flash on the other side and the 50-135 on the left...?
Might work but the cmaera would than hang in the air with the DA*16-50 attached resting on the DA*50-135 with just the grip... don't really like the thought of that.
Is the 20 really that much bigger?

From what i can see the 20 is only deeper...

i'm now eyeing the 30...
Which too big i think
Edited by Anvh: 31/05/2011 - 23:03
jules
Posted 01/06/2011 - 06:18 Link
30's definately too big for a light walkaround kit I think1 The temptation will be to fill it and then the comfort angle just goes out of the window,you'd end up carrying two bodies Stefan, Well at least I know I would! You are corrrect that the 20 is only deeper height wise, since the bags expand a bit IE they are soft could you not turn the K5 90%? the width of a K5 Can't be any more than a 1DS, that way it could just go to the bottom of the bag? Am I being daft here?
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
arto
Posted 01/06/2011 - 11:40 Link
I have a Billingham Hadley Pro and I think you'd struggle to fit those lenses and strobe into it. It's not made for big gear, in my opinion. Perfect for an LX and a couple of primes though!
johnriley
Posted 01/06/2011 - 12:54 Link
We put lenses and flashguns and more like that into our Hadley Pro bags and have no problem, so that's a bit mystifying.
Best regards, John

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo