Billingham
The only downside I see from this one is it doesn't appear to have a grab handle, which can be handy at times. Judging from all the Pics on the Billingham Site, I cannot see one on it anyway,that might be a bind? Someone correct me if I'm wrong? I would personally go for a Hadley Pro, which are just that little bit slimmer I think and fit to the Side of your body better...
I like the look of the "07" series but the cost is excessive even for the small one in my opinion
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
However, it still looks as good as new whereas my three year old Lowe is starting to look a bit grubby and tatty.
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
http://www.cambags.com/bag-type/shoulder-bags-menu/billinghamc-shoulder-bags/ite...
http://www.cambags.com/bag-type/shoulder-bags-menu/billinghamc-shoulder-bags/ite...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Indeed the 7's looks very nice, i also like the darker colour of them, they aren't that flashy.
Also thanks for the photo's that was really handy but still like to know from first hand if it will fit the gear i named.
It's quite hard to find billingham's over here you see so can't try it out
The hadly pro looks also good but i like the single larger pocket at the front to be honest.
The Hadley Pro is the perfect choice, an all-weather bag that is slim and unobtrusive, plenty roomy enough for camera and several lenses plus accessories and has a design that has no wasted space.
However, it still looks as good as new whereas my three year old Lowe is starting to look a bit grubby and tatty.
I also have a huge crumpler bag that's to heavy when fully packed and it's too big to carry around in the city or to concerts.
I know not a Billingham... but it does fit to my needs.
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-20-pinestone-shoulder-bag.a...
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/products/retrospective-10-pinestone-shoulder-bag.a...
I think the 20 is a bit square looking and there would be a lot of space left at the top of the bag?
10: ID: 12” W x 9.5” H x 6” D
20: ID: 12” W x 11.75” H x 6” D
Your 50-135 is only about half that...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
And it folds up too
It gets worse I'm off:arrow:
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
That said a D300 is a lot bigger than a K5.
Flash on the other side and the 50-135 on the left...?
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Flash on the other side and the 50-135 on the left...?
Is the 20 really that much bigger?
From what i can see the 20 is only deeper...
i'm now eyeing the 30...
Which too big i think
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.




10412 posts
18 years
Dordrecht,
the Netherlands
So i'm curious of some of you have or have tried the f/1.4 bag because that one seems to be just larger enough.
K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ