All Forum Comments
Comment by womble posted on should pentax dslrs have face detection added at 03/12/2008 - 21:34
Best wishes and well done, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on This is a great week at 03/12/2008 - 21:12
Oh well, no bargains for me today!
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on No fleabay bargains today at 03/12/2008 - 21:10
The DA* 16-50 would be ideal if you can afford it. The QC issues are over-blown and easily solved (buy from SRS!). The 16-45 is very good too and much cheaper. After all, it is only 1 stop slower.
Congrats by the way, and good luck to your friend. The one time I was persuaded to "do" a wedding was one of the most nerve wrecking events of my life not helped by my camera not coming back from the service place in time and having to borrow one from the shop!
Best wishes, Kris
Comment by womble posted on Lens & Flash for wedding (for K10D) at 03/12/2008 - 00:58
Not being a camera designer, I am assuming that the face recognition stuff is all software based (like my webcam, very unnerving) and as they have cracked it for some of the compacts, it shouldn't be too difficult to carry over to dSLRs, and certainly less development time/money than a full frame or medium format camera.
Just my halfpenny.
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on should pentax dslrs have face detection added at 03/12/2008 - 00:46
Well, I am surprised that no one has guessed
It's PaintShop Pro X
I can't remember who asked (the OP perhaps which is a bit of a slapped wrist for going off topic) but a tilt-shift lens is one which allows the lens to be either tilted relative to the film plane and/or the centre of the image shifted relative to the film plane. Tilts allow one to play around with the depth of field (either getting a lot more DOF or being very selective) and shifts allow things like not having converging verticals when photographing a building (as one does not need to tip the camera up) or photographing into a mirror without being in the reflection. They are very popular with architectural photographers who don't want to use a view camera, and landscape photographers who want everything from the tips of their toes to the furthest mountain in focus. The Pentax version, however, is only a 28mm shift which in film days was fine, but isn't really wide enough on the current crop of digital sensors.
HTH. Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Pentax or Sony? at 01/12/2008 - 21:58
About the only thing that made me think of switching to Canon was the lack of tilt/shift lenses in the Pentax range (only 28mm shift no longer in production) but I solved the problem by buying a 5x4 view camera to go with my Pentaxes....
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Pentax or Sony? at 01/12/2008 - 11:17
Many thanks, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on FA 100/3.5 Macro at 01/12/2008 - 02:09
My first SLR was an ME Super and I still use one regularly when I don't want to lug the LX about. The advantage of Pentax DSLRs is that you can use your old lenses on them with the advantage of in-body shake reduction. Principal disadvantage is a low "burst rate" if you need that sort of thing (I don't).
Best wishes, Kris.
PS could you fill in your location, please? Helps with recommending suppliers etc.


As to live view, I don't have it (and therefore don't use it!) BUT I do quite a bit of copystand-type work and I could see that it might help save me neck ache, although I am planning to try using the K10 "tethered" with the next batch to see if that works better.
Best wishes, Kris.