All Forum Comments
Comment by womble posted on Film longevity at 15/01/2009 - 16:25
Both of these were handheld, so it is my fault
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Thought I'd have a go at sunsets at 15/01/2009 - 14:54
Nerds unite!
K.
Comment by womble posted on PENTAX Lenses & Accessories Handbook at 15/01/2009 - 14:41
Mac... I have two too, but different ones to yours. One is either a Takumar or Auto Takumar (I cannot remember which now and the lens is at home and I am not), and the other is a SMC Takumar, f/3.5 version.
I didn't realise that the SMC Takumars have a slightly different M42 mount which the ES needs to make proper use of the Av mode. As I have very few Tak lenses, I was planning to stick to buying SMC versions so that they would work on both my S1a and the ES. I also have the Super Takumar 70-150mm zoom. What a monster, it weights 1.2kg.
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on SMC Takumar 135mm problem at 15/01/2009 - 14:26
Film: I have a smattering of different film bodies, all older MF ones (S1a, ES, ME Super, ME-F, MX, LX) plus a twin lens medium format and my Horseman. Take far fewer pictures, maybe a roll or two a month (excluding work related stuff). Fewer photos, less mistakes, some keepers. Some days, like yesterday, I'll just take a film camera with a single lens (usually the LX with my SMC-A 50mm F1.4). I find being made to use the old fashioned system for zoom and wide-angle (i.e. my legs) a good discipline and I liked being forced to think about the basics. This is why I haven't gone and bought a AF film camera with all the bells and whistles. Too much like my K10 with none of the advantages of digital.
The biggest difference is how I approach exposure. Usually I am photographing stuff that doesn't move (and therefore not a rush time factor). With digital, I use Av most of the time. Usually, I take the photo, check the histogram, dial in exposure compensation, retake the photo, and repeat if necessary (this obviously depends on what it is). With film, I always use manual, assess the scene, meter off something close to 18% grey, even think about zones. With the Horseman it is a spot meter and the zone system.
None of this is hard and fast, just general trends.
A bit off topic but I recently bought a winder for the LX from a fellow forum person. Utterly different sound to the LX shutter on its own, but also utterly different to the sound of the ME Super or MX with a winder. Makes no difference to the images of course, but does bring a smile to my face.
Now go and run a roll of TMax through your *ist and tell it you love it really...
Cheers, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on How much to sell my Pentax *ist for? at 15/01/2009 - 14:12
RAW is based on Tiff so why should you save it as Tiff and keep a RAW it only doubles the amount of space you need
Cheers, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Unprocessed RAW v JPEG print test at 15/01/2009 - 13:43
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Magic Lantern guides at 15/01/2009 - 13:34
Best wishes, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on Anyone using Pentax M 50mm F 1.7 on DSLR still ? at 15/01/2009 - 13:17
You could always service it yourself..?
Come on! You knew that was always going to be my suggestion.
Using a toothpick, put just a drop of lighter fluid on the auto pin at the rear of the lens. Let it soak down into the hole. Now work the pin a lot. Maybe do the routine a second time. I've seen where it was the pin and assembly that was binding.
You should probably get it done then. Pristine ones are fetching stupid money on Fleabay. Prepare yourself for it being a hundred quid or more though, but what price an old friend?
Thanks for all the advice. Any web page links for DIY?
Cheers, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on SMC Takumar 135mm problem at 15/01/2009 - 13:13
Thanks, Kris.
Comment by womble posted on SMC Takumar 135mm problem at 14/01/2009 - 17:12


Gartmore... I'll ask him next time I see him how he fixed those images.
Cheers, Kris.