PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
My best photos were taken with an ME Super and a 50mm F2 lens when that was all I had. Nothing beats an 'eye' for a good photo. Look at paulyrichard's shots. Many of them are places I have walked past a 1000 times and not given a second look at. He turns them into stunning BW architectural abstracts. Unless there is something specific you need, changing systems won't help.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Whether to go ahead at 23/09/2009 - 08:22

womble
You doubled by succesful submissions in one go!

Well done, stunning photos.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Four go into the PPG at 23/09/2009 - 08:17

womble
Not quite true John, see my post re: my 50-135mm lens. It took over two months for the lens to be repaired and returned. I had the excuse: "the technician wasn't very happy so he doing more tests" on three separate occasions.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on pentax uk support (Photopia) are a waste of time at 22/09/2009 - 16:41

womble
aminstarlondon

K.

Comment by womble posted on Is width everything? at 22/09/2009 - 15:49

womble
Amin has 8 left according to ebay... mine is a touch cheaper...

Comment by womble posted on Is width everything? at 22/09/2009 - 15:28

womble
I feel the same way. Came to work this morning with my MX loaded with BW film and my LX with slide film and the stereo adapter in my pocket.

Lunch time I shall be looking for things that'll work in stereo!

Cheers, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Pentax LX 2000 at 22/09/2009 - 13:09

womble
Although the quality is not top-notch, a very quick way of copying slides and negs is to simply use a slide copier and your camera. I can rattle through a box of 36 slides in about 20-30 minutes. Good enough quality for on-screen viewing, powerpoint, small prints and contact sheets. I then save the time-consuming scanning for the pics I want at higher resolutions.

I would be very interested in how you get on with the scanner. I have been thinking about getting a better one myself for the 8,000 slides currently residing in archival quality hanging files...

Comment by womble posted on Nothing suitable from Pentax, so I've gone Nikon at 22/09/2009 - 12:37

womble
George Lazarette wrote:
pentaxian67 wrote:
The LX sold for about $8,000.00 U.S. when they first came out.
Which, thanks to inflation, would equate to about US D20,000 today. I have to say I am surprised. I don't recall it being anything like that. My Super A cost USD250 in 1984, and I would not have expected the LX to cost thirty two times as much. Perhaps you meant USD 800?

G
I think he was referring to the LX 2000 limited edition with which this post started.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Pentax LX 2000 at 22/09/2009 - 12:27

womble
My DA* 50-135mm was fine until it was serviced. When it came back I thought I saw a hair, but that seems to have gone now so it may have been outside, or has fallen into the works! Other than that, it seems fine. The odd bit of dust won't hurt.

Comment by womble posted on DA*s - Internal Dust at 22/09/2009 - 12:25

womble
Clarky wrote:
... I can show some pics of it if anyone is interested.
Yes please! Perhaps in the "my kit" section though?

Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Old SMC M lenses at 22/09/2009 - 12:23

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo