PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
Depends what I happen to see on ebay... it keeps changing! An A* 85mm f/1.4 would be nice, but then so would a K200/2.5. Luckily, I have never seen an A* 1200 on ebay so I might be safe there. Ffordes have a couple of 28mm shift lenses which are very tempting, and then there is that mega-selection of LXs, lenses and other kit on ebay at the moment (still at $4000 last time I looked but hadn't reached its reserve).

Seriously, though, I need to use the kit I have a bit more, especially the Horseman. My biggest temptation would be a 6x7 but then once I have the body I'll need some lenses, won't I? Most of my so-called spare cash has gone on getting films developed lately!

K.

Comment by womble posted on What are you saving for now? at 30/03/2011 - 16:52

womble
cardiff_gareth wrote:
One thing with photo stacking, I've sometimes wondered why, as when shooting a non macro scene, like the flower shot, then would a uber small aperture produce a simular result?
The problem I often have with photographing wild flowers is that to use an aperture small enough to provide sufficient DoF the shutter speed is so low that the slightest breeze will give you a soft image. I'm guessing that one could use a larger aperture for a faster shutter speed then stack the results. I say guessing because I haven't tried it, yet. The alternative would be to buy a K5...

K.

Comment by womble posted on Focus Stacking at 30/03/2011 - 16:21

womble
Having got over the shock of an ugly bug crawling out of my laptop screen, yes I agree, great shot!

K.

Comment by womble posted on Chrisolina haemoptera at 30/03/2011 - 16:14

womble
Gwyn wrote:
It does even less for me straightened . It just looks wrong.
That is because it is. Time to bring out a view camera...

K.

Comment by womble posted on Gare de Bénédictins Limoges at 30/03/2011 - 16:11

womble
Frogfish wrote:
For me it's hands down the colour version.
My Lady Love thinks so too!

K.

Comment by womble posted on Help with a Venetian photo. at 30/03/2011 - 16:01

womble
I agree with everyone else that the second image is the strongest. I'd crop a fair sized slice off the the top of the first one to remove most of the blown highlights which do not really add much to the image.

K.

Comment by womble posted on the train station [3 pictures] at 30/03/2011 - 15:11

womble
Apart from the bubblegum in the foreground which needs cloning out, which version do you prefer?

1. Colour
Comment Image


2. Sepia
Comment Image


3. Monochrome
Comment Image


4. High contrast monochrome
Comment Image


Thanks! Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Help with a Venetian photo. at 30/03/2011 - 15:08

womble
The last roll of film came back from Ilford today. For some reason it took the Post Office 10 days to deliver the film to Ilford so I was getting a bit concerned! All images were shot with my LX and Rollei Retro 80S film, a variety of primes (one of K24/2.8, M28/3.5, K35/3.5, K50/1.2 or M100/2.8 ).

1. A long trip to work.
Comment Image


2. Fierce?
Comment Image


3. Seagull.
Comment Image


4. Alleyway
Comment Image


5. Misty morning
Comment Image


More images (digital, colour film and BW film, Pentax and Lubitel) are in my Venice "collection" on Flickr.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Venice in monochrome at 30/03/2011 - 14:36

womble
Looks like I'm the odd one out with No 3. Oh well. I still prefer 4!

K.

Comment by womble posted on Gare de Bénédictins Limoges at 29/03/2011 - 21:39

womble
Nice set although I don't like No. 3, all those converging verticals! I like the first one with the fountain, and I love the fourth one although I might be tempted to try and clone out some of the cables.

Well done.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Gare de Bénédictins Limoges at 29/03/2011 - 19:51

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo