All Forum Comments
Comment by Vaards posted on Pentax 645 150mm F2.8 (IF) FA at 12/02/2014 - 22:40
I was so avid Panasonic superzoom shooter. And even rather successful - pic of week at Photo.net, couple of local, russian and international contests.
My jorney with Panasonic ended two years later... Just because it was stolen from my girlfriend`s flat. We went to supermarket for 20 minutes, closing two spyder type metal doors (spyder type - where in all directions comes out steel rods). And when we came back, opened both doors, there was complete chaos... Flat is located on 3rd floor and thieves arrived through balcony - first and second floor flats had steel grid on their balcony, so, it was good stairs for thieves.
And both supersecure doors secured thiewes - when doors started to make opening noise, they had plenty of time to evacuate. May by for my and girfriends luck - we didn`t met them. Although feeling was rather unsecura and unpleasant checking out all rooms at that moment.
So, I lost my lovely Panasonic... And searching lombards in that area, checking advertisements on web with hope to notice my Panasonic somewhere (it wasn`t possible to buy it in Latvia, our official representative didn`t imported that model to Baltic states), I found an interesting add for Pentax...
Pentax MZ6 + Grip + FA 50mm/1.4 + Sigma 24-70mm+ ten films+photobag+shutter cable and some filters... for 100 LVL (~120GBP).
I called to them and agreed to met with seller. Advertisement seemed suspicious, but after phone conversation with young russian guy it seemed totalyy suspicious - we agreed to met a 22:00 on street where is located mental hospital for those guys who is prisoned.
I took with me an expert (other young guy who were pentax user and I knew him personally), so arriving that area, with old and dirty wooden houses, blinking yellow street lamps, zero people on streets... Real heroin people area.
We walked down the street, and further down the street there was no lamps anymore. Expert vants to turn back, but I convince him to check out that street number - just two houses left.
Finding that house number, we stare onto old and partially rotten 3 floor wooden building... On one side of building is plate "Church ortodox baptists, etc something like this". My expert wants to leave again (don`t want to get into some kind of sect), I convince him to call and see what will happen.
Call is answered again by young russian guy - he comes to us and seems small, skinny, intelligent and polite person We feel encouraged to follow buy our anathomical superiority). Ok, we are going into church and he ask us to wait a 10 minutes till end of mess or whatever. We seat down and wait... Church is tiny, romantic, really budget option without any kind of gold plated decorations, paintings and iconas.
Arrives pastor, asks us to follow to second floor. Ok, we follow....
He brings to me photo bag and asks to check out items till he changes clothes. We opened bag, but there is mint camera and mint lenses with all papers showing that camera was bought half a year ago at our official Pentax store. So 1,5 yearss warranty left.
Arrives our pastor (now he has jeans and "grandmas knitted look" sweater) and shows us Minolta dimage superzoom z2 - he bought digital superzoom and decided to move away from film era. He says that Pentax Mz6 made 100 actuations and forth film is still inside.
So, we paid asked 100 LVL to our friendly pastor, and went away with really surprised feeling.
===
So I`m stuck with pentax. From that time I got more than ten medium format AF lenses, more than 20 af 35mm lenses, more than common sense PTTL flashes (I have ten of them, because sometimes I shot weddings together with second shooter).
My Fa 50mm/1.4 is kind of saint lens for me.
Comment by Vaards posted on Why did you buy a Pantax? at 11/02/2014 - 09:33
Truly proffesional visual communication!
Comment by Vaards posted on The very best of Russian wedding photography at 31/01/2014 - 17:39
And usually prefer FA 75mm; FA 120macro and FA 200mm. Somehow prefer longer or shorter.
I`ll think about sell/not to sell till tomorrow.
I checked out ffordes too - my item do not have lens hood, although I can`t see any scratches on painting or any other marks. It is noticable used lens, but seems slightly better quality than ffordes (their sample has marks on hood bayonet - mine do not have). I bought it absolutely mint a lot of years ago and have mounted on camera may be 5 times. But due to change of works/getting married/ changing living places I just lost box with hood on some transit point.
But I have soft pouch - ffordes do not have one.
Comment by Vaards posted on w.t.b. Pentax-FA 645 150mm 2.8 at 10/12/2013 - 00:23
Lens is sold to Smoked - polite and friendly customer from Russia.
At beginning I was worried to send out so expencive gadget, but everything went smooth!
Comment by Vaards posted on FS: Voigtlander 125mm/F2.5 Macro APO Lanthar SL at 10/12/2013 - 00:14
I also doubt that Pentax would have invested so much effort into their revolutionary new system to reduce moire, if there was not a very good reason to do so.
That`s why we need to pay extra attention to features like this. To understand strengths and weaknesses of new features. Pentax is improving SAFOX all the time. It becomes better and better, but... Still two times worse than leaders.
Comment by Vaards posted on K3 resolution at 12/11/2013 - 18:26
[quote:3496ace15f="johnriley"]The lack of AA filter isn't any sort of worry as there is the AA Filter Simulator.
John K
Comment by Vaards posted on K3 resolution at 12/11/2013 - 16:34
Vaards, you may have misunderstood what I was saying. The K-3 has no AA filter but it does have two strengths of AA Filter Simulator that will reduce or remove moire. So in the one camera you have a choice, with or without moire reduction as you wish.
I'm currently trying to get a repeatable moire effect to show the action of the simulator but I'm having a problem finding something that reliably produces moire.
It is obvious that these shake simulations can substitute AA quite efectively. Besides, author of original photo just assured that AA was off.
What I mean - when one shots even animal, it seems better to use AA or simulation, because animals and birds have repeating pattern.
In worst case there is risk to get one spectrum of rainbow, like on blue neckerchief.
Comment by Vaards posted on K3 resolution at 12/11/2013 - 16:30
Is this your own evaluation or is there an article somewhere discussing this 'issue' with this particular image?
Comment by Vaards posted on K3 resolution at 12/11/2013 - 14:52


But after conversation, I checked my pics and decided to keep FA 80-160 zoom and FA 150 too. It`s so dreamy lens!