Tyr

Joined: 11th April 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Tyr
Quote:
If your graphics card supports it why not go for dual screen rather than wide screen.

I use a phillips 170C for editing and have all the toolbars, and browsers on the other screen (octigen M17) this gives me loads of space for editing without tools all over the image. EG you can have silkypix running with all the tools open without being cluttered.

Be careful though Windows will only allow one colour profile to be loaded to the graphics card at any one time. Hence you can only edit colours properly on one screen.

I colour profiled the Phillips and it's really good with wide Gammut range, the Octigen is pretty poor colour wise.
Widescreen is better than dual screens unless you get one wide and one standard cheap one.

1920x1200 is absolutely amazing for photo work and there is no need for a second screen. The ratio means toolbars fit along the sides of a 3:2 image perfectly.

I wouldn't mind a 2560x1600 screen though

Comment by Tyr posted on LCD Monitor at 31/05/2007 - 11:00

Tyr
Quote:
How does one transport one's Digital Camera, betteries, charger, lenses, and memory cards?

Do any x-ray machines out there have a negative effect on the camera or the memory cards?

I'll be going to Oshkosh next month, so it's on an "I HAVE to know" basis.
Personally I carry mine in my hand luggage with my notebook computer. X-rays will have no adverse effects on and of this equipment.

Memory cards use a solid state storage system so any kind of EMP will fry them but when are you going to be near a nuke blast? (No idea where Oshkosh is but I hope Putin isn't pointing more missiles there)

Comment by Tyr posted on X Rays at Airports at 04/06/2007 - 23:09

Tyr
As long as I've got them before Sept 1st I'll be happy. I can live without, I hope, till then... I need them for shooting in Scotland. damn rain!

Comment by Tyr posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 27/04/2007 - 17:56

Tyr
Well that is one good vote, and I was glad to see the SMC-FA Limited lenses available in back as I'd prefer them to blend with the body rather than shout out loudly, "LOOK! SILVERY!!!".

I assume prices are the same if I go into the shop to have a look/buy there...

Comment by Tyr posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 26/04/2007 - 15:14

Tyr
Well, I can wait until September for these two. Was thinking that I'd rather not get the 18-55 as a stop gap but for £50 it isn't that bad... I'd still use the 50-200 as the 50-135 isn't quite enough. Really got to put it into perspective, £50 now and be able to take photos on a DSLR or nothing till later in the year, I think the choice is simple.

I am hoping the 16-50 is sharper that the 16-45 and has less vignette as it won't be worth the price for the SDM and weatherproofing alone. The 77mm glass front should deliver a lot of light though.

EDIT: never heard of SRS microsystems... Anyone have any experience?

Was leaning towards warehouse express as I've used them before but these prices are even lower!

Comment by Tyr posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 26/04/2007 - 14:24

Tyr
Argh, the wait for the DA* lenses is driving me mad! I really hope Pentax have a good supply as I don't want to be stuck waiting for the 16-50. I can wait for the 50-135 as I will use it much less than the other.

Why do they get to pre-order in the US? The Atlantic price and availability gap is so unfair.

Comment by Tyr posted on DA* Lens information for the first two but not the 60-250mm at 26/04/2007 - 13:53

Tyr
Quote:
The Pentax batteries have gold-coloured contacts, all the third party batteries I have seen have had silver ones, this being the only visible difference (other than the labels). So there might be some slight difference....unless someone else knows better!
The ones I got have gold contacts, they are much better for the camera as there is less resistance and they don't degrade.

Comment by Tyr posted on Stupid K10D battery prices at 14/07/2007 - 15:00

Tyr
Quote:
Fair point, but why would we buy a Minolta battery to put in a Pentax camera? A slightly strange thing to do, especially if the spec is not the same? Although batteries may fit, they may not fit exactly, they may have different ratings, it may or may not be significant.

On the other hand, there would not seem to be much argument against putting a Samsung GX10 battery in a Pentax K10D, or vice-versa should we wish to.
The Minolta batteries are identical except in the mAh rating which is its 'longevity' when fully charged. It is 1550 rather than 1750 which will not make a big difference in battery life. It will most certainly not damage the camera.

Comment by Tyr posted on Stupid K10D battery prices at 14/07/2007 - 09:09

Tyr
I've got the battery that came with the camera and one Hahnel Pentax/Minolta battery. Only 1550mAh but seems to last just as long as the Pentax branded one. £20 rather than £40-50, I can't really justify over £25 and under £15 makes me think the quality isn't up to scratch.

Comment by Tyr posted on Stupid K10D battery prices at 13/07/2007 - 09:59

Tyr
Quote:
George Lazarette wrote:
If I needed a battery, this is what I would get:
http://www.digitalmediastore.co.uk/product_info.php?products_id=761&osCsid=1...
7dayshop seem to have them beaten for price.
http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=777_3&products_id=992...

In fact I bought a couple last week because I thought I might crack and buy a K10D. I haven't cracked so far, but it's rather sad having batteries for a camera I don't own... yet.

Andrew McP
I'd say that is rather strange. Secondly, batteries don't keep well uncharged 40-60% cool storage is recommended for rechargeable Li-on.

Comment by Tyr posted on Stupid K10D battery prices at 12/07/2007 - 22:20

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo