All Forum Comments
Comment by TonyM posted on A decline in DSLR sales threatens camera companies at 15/10/2013 - 08:05
The photographs at the bottom were taken with the lens yesterday at f/8. I'm only selling because I find manual telephoto too difficult and my 55-300 does the job for me. Price is £25 plus £8 for UK shipping. I usually bundle postage, but this thing is HEAVY (nearly a kilo including case - can be used to fend off would-be robbers though!)







Comment by TonyM posted on FS: Vivitar 200mm f/3.5 at 13/10/2013 - 11:28
Comment by TonyM posted on FS: Sigma Mini-Wide II 28mm f/2.8 Manual Focus at 13/10/2013 - 10:21
McGregNi
After the utter pasting I took yesterday
Tony
Comment by TonyM posted on Polesden Lacy Showcase at 13/10/2013 - 10:15
And this is also a FULL FRAME lens!!!!!
Bump.


Comment by TonyM posted on FS: Sigma Mini-Wide II 28mm f/2.8 Manual Focus at 12/10/2013 - 15:38
I seriously went off wine and experimented for a while with all the various types of bottled beers. Not bad, but not exciting really.
Happily my taste for fine wine has returned, thus solving the problem.
Comment by TonyM posted on Another pointless thread at 11/10/2013 - 22:26
I've just opened a bottle of Thwaites. Decided it must be my lack of imbibing that is holding back the England team (though I'll probably need a crate if we're going to score at this rate :shock
Comment by TonyM posted on Another pointless thread at 11/10/2013 - 22:24
Comment by TonyM posted on FOR SALE: SMC PENTAX-DA 16-45MM 1:4 at 11/10/2013 - 22:12
Comment by TonyM posted on Another pointless thread at 11/10/2013 - 20:58
For peace of mind I will offer a 12 month warranty on the lens - if it gives any problems then send it back for a full refund of all costs (done me well for at least four years!)
The price is £25 including UK postage - no offers please; I believe this is a fair price and any less I'd rather keep it sat next to its sibling




f/2.8

f/2.8 "macro"

f/2.8

f/8

Comment by TonyM posted on FS: Sigma Mini-Wide II 28mm f/2.8 Manual Focus at 11/10/2013 - 15:05


There is a serious discussion to be had around the optical viewfinder. That single 'option' requires significant hardware and space. Take that away, as you do when you use liveview, and you've got the same lens and sensor, just without the volume the optical viewfinder consumes.
I'm a fan of the optical viewfinder, but if I push myself to say why, a lot of it has to do with the stability the position you hold it in gives you and the obvious that it's in line with your eyes anyway.
Maybe that's why a lot of phone cam and compacy pics are blurred
As for stability, I do what most experienced users seem to do and use Tv mode set to 1/80 for snapping, switching to Av when I have a need for limited dof.
So I see the whole market changing as people buy the tools that most fit their requirements.