superdavis

Joined: 20th January 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

superdavis
Hello

I am willing to buy this lens. Please, send me you offer if you are willing to sell. Shipment to Latvia should be accepted. Payment - bank transfer/PayPal etc.

Kind regards
Davis

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 17/06/2015 - 08:45

superdavis
SOLD TO user: ccoolliinn

Comment by superdavis posted on FS: Tamron 17-50 2.8 like NEW at 14/03/2012 - 15:48

superdavis
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
Welcome to the Tamron 17-50. I don't believe you will find a copy that won't do this. I recommend checking focus on the screen immediately after the shot. I have my K200D set up to zoom in 8x with one click of the rear wheel for checking focus quickly.
I used to own Tam 17-50, that did not have these problems. I am more of convinced that most of the complaint cases on back/front focusing is caused by users & camera AF interaction. In the end, AF is an automated solution that focuses on something by certain rules and, as we all know, this can never be 100% accurate and sometimes, especially in low light or high-contrast cases, it is fooled often enough

Comment by superdavis posted on Back focussing issues on a 17-50 Tamron at 09/03/2012 - 09:32

superdavis
sorted78 wrote:
Apologies if it's a stupid question, but presumably in the example above you are certain the AF point was on the tip of the boat?
Good remark. AF is not the God and you still have to get used to it and make sure it focuses correctly or simply - where you plan. I have a good example - my AF miss rate is low, as I am constantly monitoring how the AF is locked and my eyesight is good enough to tell that if it is not correct. Then for my girlfriend who just "clicks" the button, of course the miss rate is much higher.

Do simple test. Take a newspaper, book etc... open a page and focus on the certain part of the text and make sure it is in focus in Viewfinder. Then check the picture - if you see the same, lens is ok and it is you who needs the "exchange" , if you see misfocuss in picture - that means the lens has focuss issues.

Comment by superdavis posted on Back focussing issues on a 17-50 Tamron at 09/03/2012 - 08:13

superdavis
SOLD> payment pending

Comment by superdavis posted on FS: Tamron 17-50 2.8 like NEW at 29/02/2012 - 10:58

superdavis
Have you considered buying used flash? If you find one in good condition you can definately afford some better flash.

F.ex., I managed to ebay Pentax 540 in a very good condintion in aroud GBP 180, which is only 10 GBP above your budget.

So my real advice - get good flash. Poor flashes have higher rate of disappointment, as none of the flashes will work perfect just like that.

If you can't afford good flash in a new condition, wait until good offer pop up for used one.

Comment by superdavis posted on my flash choices........but which one? at 29/02/2012 - 08:43

superdavis
Ciao Cintellii67

PM pls. This was also bought in Amazon.de, so the same warranty applies.

Davis

Comment by superdavis posted on FS: Tamron 17-50 2.8 like NEW at 10/02/2012 - 12:35

superdavis
Hi,

I would like to sell by brand new Tamron 17-50 2.8. Bought in Dec2011 and used just few times. In original box and with original accesories.

The lens is located in Germany and I am asking 240 Eur incl. shipment to your doors.

I can add picturs upon request, but as said, the lens is and looks like new with no signs of usage.

Superdavis

Comment by superdavis posted on FS: Tamron 17-50 2.8 like NEW at 06/02/2012 - 09:53

superdavis
vrapan wrote:
Nikkor 16-85 3.5 - 5.6
Canon 15-85 3.5-5.6


So f4 would be good anything faster a surprise 2.8 a miracle
Also Sony CZ 16-80 is 3.5-4.5. And this was not cheap lens. So I guess 16-85 F 2.8 DA* type would cost a fortune that few could afford ;(

Comment by superdavis posted on New Pentax lens roadmap at 03/02/2012 - 08:31

superdavis
When I used to shoot Sony, CZ 16-80 was my most loved lens. I could not find any similar.
the only pitty for DA*16-80 is that the plan is only for 2013
until that I'll have to live with 16-50 and primes

Comment by superdavis posted on New Pentax lens roadmap at 02/02/2012 - 15:44

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo