superdavis

Joined: 20th January 2012

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

superdavis
lepiallou wrote:
In the case you are still looking for the lens I might sell mine (DA).

I am looking for 330€, shipping not included (I need to check but should be about 12-15€).
PM sent

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: Pentax Ltd 15mm at 05/07/2016 - 09:23

superdavis
nocturnal wrote:
The HD one is better again. The myth that the HD can't starburst is myth also. Good luck.
I agree, i was more assuming that I am ok with older/cheaper lens, which DA would probably be

Jonathan-Mac wrote:
Good luck with your search, I'm not parting with my DA 15mm

A word of warning - the DA 15mm is prone to de-centring, .... A good 15mm will give you nice results though, so worth getting one.
Thanks for the warning, have not actually heard of this issue. I have 21,35,70 Ltds already so 15mm is my last missing piece in ideal set up

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: Pentax Ltd 15mm at 29/06/2016 - 12:38

superdavis
Hello, I am looking for the Pentax DA-15mm Ltd lens in good condition (DA preffered, but HD would also be ok). Delivery to Riga, Latvia. Please, send me you reasonable offers. I have bough/sold several lenses here.
Regards, Davis

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: Pentax Ltd 15mm at 28/06/2016 - 12:52

superdavis
Deal done with forum member Doubled!!! Great lens and great support from seller!

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 20/07/2015 - 09:14

superdavis
bump

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 27/06/2015 - 07:48

superdavis
Gyotto wrote:
Anyway... in near future I will sell one Or my wife will divorce
But rly still did not decice which one...
Sounds promising so I like F, you like FA - the only thing that's missing is the deal

I am happy, you are happy and what's most important - your wife is happy

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 19/06/2015 - 08:25

superdavis
Gyotto wrote:
one seems to be made with a higher quality.
As said, it is not matter of quality, rather than personal preference of build type

womble wrote:
The FA is possibly the most butt-ugly lens I have ever seen. If the optical quality is the same I'd go for the F.
Somehow I share the feeling, but I have no choice then of course i would go for FA, as optically it delivers what I need, and that's what matters the most

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 19/06/2015 - 07:54

superdavis
Gyotto wrote:
On Pentaxforums reviews you can see the F one has a little bit higher result, but believe me, it's the same lens...
Agree, that optically they are the same. my preference is more based on built type (not even quality) of F series v FA series.

So now I only need some one selling me one of these beauties

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 18/06/2015 - 11:10

superdavis
Gyotto wrote:
Comment Image
Looks nice which one you prefer? I would go for F.

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 18/06/2015 - 09:34

superdavis
Gyotto wrote:
I have both eheheheh
so which one you are trading in?

Comment by superdavis posted on WTB: smc F or FA 135mm 2.8 at 18/06/2015 - 07:27

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo