All Forum Comments
Goog Work...Not that I'd know anything about dance....lol
Comment by stub posted on Motionhouse at 03/06/2018 - 20:45
Ah Sorry probably my error... But I still stand by my point that Johnsons should play judge and jury in these cases. In my experience it isn't so much the moisture getting in. But when it has it has nowhere to evaporate to as its still sealed more or less..
Comment by stub posted on Weatherproofing - Lifespan at 31/05/2018 - 23:34
Just a few queries I have in this... Yes Ive tried to sit on the fence...lol
When you say you were informed the door seals are showing signs of "Corrosion" is that different to wear and tear ? Rubber in its usual forms, has a working temp of something like -25 to 200 degrees. So in my thoughts using it even in a tropical jungle would have no effect on its operation. Hence the Pentax advertising. You state your K3 has had a minor door repair which suggests there could be damage or wear to the seals.
So I feel Johnsons have a major role to play in these cases. As to who is liable. As the official repairer. Pentax should let them police these cases and back their decisions. Its for them to detect the cause of the ingress. Or indeed what has caused it or any corrosion.. Their decision to say if a unit meets what is at best a ropey weatherproof standard. If its wear and tear then I think Pentax are not liable and have shown a degree of sympathy in offering a reduced cost replacement.
If the windows leak on your car after four years. You don't get a replacement car for free
.
When you say you were informed the door seals are showing signs of "Corrosion" is that different to wear and tear ? Rubber in its usual forms, has a working temp of something like -25 to 200 degrees. So in my thoughts using it even in a tropical jungle would have no effect on its operation. Hence the Pentax advertising. You state your K3 has had a minor door repair which suggests there could be damage or wear to the seals.
So I feel Johnsons have a major role to play in these cases. As to who is liable. As the official repairer. Pentax should let them police these cases and back their decisions. Its for them to detect the cause of the ingress. Or indeed what has caused it or any corrosion.. Their decision to say if a unit meets what is at best a ropey weatherproof standard. If its wear and tear then I think Pentax are not liable and have shown a degree of sympathy in offering a reduced cost replacement.
If the windows leak on your car after four years. You don't get a replacement car for free
.
Comment by stub posted on Weatherproofing - Lifespan at 31/05/2018 - 21:23
Last two are a different class...
Comment by stub posted on Mach Loop and RAF Cosford at 31/05/2018 - 17:27
excellent !! Gives you an uplift.
Comment by stub posted on Motorsport published at 31/05/2018 - 09:52
