All Forum Comments
Comment by steven9761 posted on Royal Mail ban on lithium batteries?! at 08/02/2013 - 17:27
@ JohnX - I've been working in the international express industry for the past 25 years or so, and I'm also IATA/ICAO certificated, so I do know the regulations. RM has a tendency to apply "overkill" as they don't really have designated staff to deal with such articles.
Carriage of Dangerous Goods By Air is heavily regulated, and can only be transported once packed in accordance with these regulations, in UN-specified containers, with a dangerous goods note issued to cover these goods. They must never, ever be consolidated onto one Master Airway Bill (MAWB), thus they travel at FULL IATA FREIGHT rates, which is "prohibitively" expensive. I would expect a typical freight quote for Dangerous Goods to be around the £150 (minimum) mark.
Certain items simply cannot ever be uplifted by either commercial, or cargo aircraft. Nothing that relates to photographic equipment falls into this category, thankfully.
I'd have thought that RM would permit batteries to be carried (at least by UK surface mail) since the goods are being supplied from a verifiable retailer. It's the "Acme" batteries that present the problem. Basically (as I interpret these regulations), batteries fall into any one of three categories:
"White list" - DURACELL, EVER READY, and any other "dedicated" battery manufacturer.
"Grey list" - Panasonic, Sony, Kodak, Samsung, etc. These are likely to have been 3rd-party manufactured by a reputable supplier, where there are stringent quality controls in place.
"Black list" - basically any battery (usually made in a "sweat-shop" in the Far East) where there is no accountability/traceability, and generally are packaged with "made-up" names, but visually similar to the genuine article - Sonething along the lines of "PONY" (sounds like Sony).
The "rule of thumb" being that the white listed batteries can be safely loaded into the cargo hold, with minimum checks. Grey listed ones, subject to stringent checks (and possible repackaging to IATA/ICAO standards) can be placed in the hold only after satisfying these stringent requirements. The black list - 'nuff said!!
Comment by steven9761 posted on Royal Mail ban on lithium batteries?! at 08/02/2013 - 17:13
Carriage of Dangerous Goods By Air is heavily regulated, and can only be transported once packed in accordance with these regulations, in UN-specified containers, with a dangerous goods note issued to cover these goods. They must never, ever be consolidated onto one Master Airway Bill (MAWB), thus they travel at FULL IATA FREIGHT rates, which is "prohibitively" expensive. I would expect a typical freight quote for Dangerous Goods to be around the £150 (minimum) mark.
Certain items simply cannot ever be uplifted by either commercial, or cargo aircraft. Nothing that relates to photographic equipment falls into this category, thankfully.
Comment by steven9761 posted on Royal Mail ban on lithium batteries?! at 08/02/2013 - 15:53
Otherwise, if the batteries are unbranded (Acme Battery Co, etc) - basically of "questionable" quality, then they are not permitted into the aircraft hold, and should be carried upon the person as cabin baggage. Again - I'd strongly recommend taping over the contacts.
The reason for these regulations is that it has been proven that lithium batteries can spontaneously combust when exposed to air. You may recall a few years ago that Sony had a huge problem with laptops because of this very thing, and when a plane is travelling at 35,000 feet - there's only one place it's gonna go in the event of a major incident, and gravity plays a very big part in that decision.
Comment by steven9761 posted on Royal Mail ban on lithium batteries?! at 08/02/2013 - 15:00
I may need an assistant to carry it around for me
Not to mention a lottery winner to buy it for me any offers:
Comment by steven9761 posted on Pentax DA 560mm lens now shipping in the US at 07/02/2013 - 14:44
Comment by steven9761 posted on Pentax DA 560mm lens now shipping in the US at 07/02/2013 - 08:41
Comment by steven9761 posted on My first K30 shots, ever. at 06/02/2013 - 19:56
2nd one appears to have a bit of a tungsten-type hue.
3rd one is a bit "heavy" on the red end of the colour spectrum. A bit of PP to tone it down a bit, I think.
4 - That's the one for me, although it might work a bit better in B/W, to make it look a bit more "newspaper feature imagey", in keeping with the events that took place in that street. It might be my dodgy eyesight, but the cars in the pic look a bit out-of-focus.
Well done though!!
Comment by steven9761 posted on My first K30 shots, ever. at 06/02/2013 - 19:37
That's so unfair, Benji!!... How come when our company imports and exports all those garments and lingerie, there's never a dolly-bird inside them to show them off at their best?? What's your secret, big guy??
It's my drivers that get to see the dolly-birds!! I'm being told constantly about the German girls that own Felder Felder by one of our drivers!!
Comment by steven9761 posted on Sexy Daisy Lowe Undresses for Yo Dona Magazine at 06/02/2013 - 19:25
Comment by steven9761 posted on Kodachrome at 06/02/2013 - 18:23


I still don't see why correctly packaged batteries, as per the specification given, cannot be sent by post. It just tells us how to send them and how many can be sent.
On a daily basis, I see shipments described as "spare parts", which is vague, since these particular parts may have a dual purpose, for example, in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. A more reasonable (and more accurate) description of these machine parts would be along the lines of "Pentax camera spare parts". Similarly, if the batteries are declared as "Pentax LI-ion battery LI-019 battery for Pentax Kr camera" then it gives somebody the opportunity of making a more informed decision as to its safety, or otherwise, with a second opinion sought from someone in a position of authority on such matters.