All Forum Comments
Comment by sledge posted on zoo animals at 13/07/2008 - 19:48
thought this was a forum for open opion!
i made a mistake offering to help others, but hey thats life.
and as for matt i have all paperwork and the ligit serial.
now look at this a differant way. a new member comes on a forum he thinks will be useful to himself and only gets shit, i can't be arse with all this. so i won't return. thanks for nothing to the people that made me feel this way
i made a mistake offering to help others, but hey thats life.
and as for matt i have all paperwork and the ligit serial.
now look at this a differant way. a new member comes on a forum he thinks will be useful to himself and only gets shit, i can't be arse with all this. so i won't return. thanks for nothing to the people that made me feel this way
Comment by sledge posted on Why do people spend money on photoshop? at 11/07/2008 - 09:21
Quote:
And why do you now mention only one free program (Quote: "it was a genuine copy" when earlier you mentioned two, which you obtained at different times (Quote: "and before that CS2".
If there have been two "built coms" (whatever they are), both of which came with the offer of a genuine program worth £600.00 "thrown in", why refer to just one?
Sorry, but to a keen legal mind your revised explanation does not hold water.
G
i had cs2 pryer to it which i bought then my com broke so i had one built which had cs3 thrown in. and when i said currently because i havent made up my mind about which is better because i have heard differant opions on both good and bad. as for the 2 i was on about cs.at the end of the day you can read into what you like but i was trying to be helpful, is this a crime. you may have a legal mind, now try having a common one, and see it as my writing is'nt that great and what i mean does'nt always come out the same way.sledge wrote:
So why did you use the word "currently"? There is nothing current about the simple past tense. Quote:
"i use cs3 and before that cs2. from what i know THESE are exspensive (sic) programs which i currently got free" [Plural and ongoing]
And:
"to be honest mate i got IT free when i bought the com" [Singular and a one-off]
These two statements are not quite congruent, so I think Matt was possibly right in his presumption. And if he wasn't, his mistake is understandable.
Love the "to be honest" bit.
G
sorry missed typed it was suppose to be an "o". i can see how it would look nowDon wrote:
Here's another heads up...
Mattmatic is very well respected here. For many good reasons.
I thought the same thing. You are obviously trying to be generous and helpful in your earlier post. But adobe does not give away, nor allow you to give away it's software. If you got one for free...MUMS the word.
javascript:emoticon('')
Quite so. This is what the Sledge said (my emphasis):Quote:
to be honest mate i got it free when i bought the com so, think twice before accusing people. as for sharing illegal software that would be a dumb thing to do. so go pick up your rattle!
next time find out facts before making statements like that!
A very strong...well let's call it RUDE...response to a diplomaticly phrased heads up.to be honest mate i got it free when i bought the com so, think twice before accusing people. as for sharing illegal software that would be a dumb thing to do. so go pick up your rattle!
next time find out facts before making statements like that!
Here's another heads up...
Mattmatic is very well respected here. For many good reasons.
I thought the same thing. You are obviously trying to be generous and helpful in your earlier post. But adobe does not give away, nor allow you to give away it's software. If you got one for free...MUMS the word.
javascript:emoticon('')
"i use cs3 and before that cs2. from what i know THESE are exspensive (sic) programs which i currently got free" [Plural and ongoing]
And:
"to be honest mate i got IT free when i bought the com" [Singular and a one-off]
These two statements are not quite congruent, so I think Matt was possibly right in his presumption. And if he wasn't, his mistake is understandable.
Love the "to be honest" bit.
G
And why do you now mention only one free program (Quote: "it was a genuine copy" when earlier you mentioned two, which you obtained at different times (Quote: "and before that CS2".
If there have been two "built coms" (whatever they are), both of which came with the offer of a genuine program worth £600.00 "thrown in", why refer to just one?
Sorry, but to a keen legal mind your revised explanation does not hold water.
G
@ malo no prob's it's so easy to read things that have no feelings, the wrong way.
Comment by sledge posted on Why do people spend money on photoshop? at 11/07/2008 - 01:19
Quote:
"i use cs3 and before that cs2. from what i know THESE are exspensive (sic) programs which i currently got free" [Plural and ongoing]
And:
"to be honest mate i got IT free when i bought the com" [Singular and a one-off]
These two statements are not quite congruent, so I think Matt was possibly right in his presumption. And if he wasn't, his mistake is understandable.
Love the "to be honest" bit.
G
sorry missed typed it was suppose to be an "o". i can see how it would look nowDon wrote:
Here's another heads up...
Mattmatic is very well respected here. For many good reasons.
I thought the same thing. You are obviously trying to be generous and helpful in your earlier post. But adobe does not give away, nor allow you to give away it's software. If you got one for free...MUMS the word.
javascript:emoticon('')
Quite so. This is what the Sledge said (my emphasis):Quote:
to be honest mate i got it free when i bought the com so, think twice before accusing people. as for sharing illegal software that would be a dumb thing to do. so go pick up your rattle!
next time find out facts before making statements like that!
A very strong...well let's call it RUDE...response to a diplomaticly phrased heads up.to be honest mate i got it free when i bought the com so, think twice before accusing people. as for sharing illegal software that would be a dumb thing to do. so go pick up your rattle!
next time find out facts before making statements like that!
Here's another heads up...
Mattmatic is very well respected here. For many good reasons.
I thought the same thing. You are obviously trying to be generous and helpful in your earlier post. But adobe does not give away, nor allow you to give away it's software. If you got one for free...MUMS the word.
javascript:emoticon('')
"i use cs3 and before that cs2. from what i know THESE are exspensive (sic) programs which i currently got free" [Plural and ongoing]
And:
"to be honest mate i got IT free when i bought the com" [Singular and a one-off]
These two statements are not quite congruent, so I think Matt was possibly right in his presumption. And if he wasn't, his mistake is understandable.
Love the "to be honest" bit.
G
Comment by sledge posted on Why do people spend money on photoshop? at 10/07/2008 - 22:52
Quote:
Next time you want to play Santa, maybe it is wise to give some extra info, specially when it comes to give away freebies worth $ 600,- or more. Don't act surprised if people think" illegal". I did also, and i know i am not the only one here.
Just my 2 cnts,
Martin.
for your facts mate is was a built com worth alot of money and i had the offer of the program thrown in. so i took it. it was a genuine copy. sorry if my comment upset anyone, but when your new to a form and are basicly being told that you are selling knocks offs and a liar, then i'm sure lots of people on here would have reacted the same.sledge wrote:
next time find out facts before making statements like that!
Could you please give us the name and address from the store were you bought your computer? And are they still giving away free full versions of PS CS? I think 50% of our forum members will place an order, before you can say B.llsh.t. next time find out facts before making statements like that!
Next time you want to play Santa, maybe it is wise to give some extra info, specially when it comes to give away freebies worth $ 600,- or more. Don't act surprised if people think" illegal". I did also, and i know i am not the only one here.
Just my 2 cnts,
Martin.
i was just trying to be helpful, and if i get a reaction like that then this forum is not what i thought it would be like!
so much for trying to help others out
Comment by sledge posted on Why do people spend money on photoshop? at 10/07/2008 - 22:49
Quote:
They'd like one from you
Sounds to me like you have an illegal copy, not a "free" one
Do not use this forum for sharing illegal software
Going back on thread
As I mentioned, PSE is a fine, fine program and suitable for most photographic needs... and some. I'm generally happy to work with PSE, but not all my work is 100% photographic... and that's where PS-CS2 comes in
Unlocker: that might be possible...
Matt
to be honest mate i got it free when i bought the com so, think twice before accusing people. as for sharing illegal software that would be a dumb thing to do. so go pick up your rattle!Quote:
if any one would like a copy let me know.
How about Adobe for a start?? Or FAST (Federation Against Software Theft)?if any one would like a copy let me know.
They'd like one from you
Sounds to me like you have an illegal copy, not a "free" one
Do not use this forum for sharing illegal software
Going back on thread
As I mentioned, PSE is a fine, fine program and suitable for most photographic needs... and some. I'm generally happy to work with PSE, but not all my work is 100% photographic... and that's where PS-CS2 comes in
Unlocker: that might be possible...
Matt
next time find out facts before making statements like that!
Comment by sledge posted on Why do people spend money on photoshop? at 10/07/2008 - 17:49
i use cs3 and before that cs2. from what i know these are exspensive programs which i currently get free so to me it's easier to get a well know program rather that a program i have never heard of. if any one would like a copy let me know.
cheers
cheers
Comment by sledge posted on Why do people spend money on photoshop? at 10/07/2008 - 14:32
i like the 3rd and 4th pic . great quality
thanks for sharing
thanks for sharing
Comment by sledge posted on House Sparrow at 10/07/2008 - 14:34
are these any good? whats the best one for the best money? and do they do what they say on the box ? lol
TIA
TIA
Comment by sledge posted on teleconverter at 09/07/2008 - 00:49
whats the best 500mm len's, that i can buy for as little as poss? i have a k100d super.
TIA
TIA
Comment by sledge posted on 500mm len's at 09/07/2008 - 00:41
Amur Tiger
Emperor Tamarin
White Rhino
Snow Leopard
Otters
All C & C welcome