All Forum Comments
Comment by simonkit posted on 70-300 sigma vs Tamron - test images at 07/04/2008 - 22:34
Lenses are the Sigma APO DG & Tamron DI LD
I've already posted large images on another forum & as I think image sizes are restricted here (please let me know if this isn't the case) the best I can do is link to my original post
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=27476732
I'm sure if this isn't acceptable Mr Administrator will let me know asap & I'll remove the post
simon
Comment by simonkit posted on 70-300 sigma vs Tamron - test images at 07/04/2008 - 20:26
I've decided not to post any more images as it's not really my intention to produce a "scientific" comparison - I'll just comment on my own user impressions...
-- Sharpness, inline with reviews my Sigma 70-300 does show quite soft corners at anything wider than F8 - reducing the aperture to F11/F16 does help.
Ultimately I would say that the Tamron produces generally sharper images, not a massive difference at F11 and above but there is a difference
-- colour/contrast, this is where I very much prefer the Sigma. It just seems to produce nicer looking images to me.
-- build quality, I personally prefer the Sigma - feels a nicer lens to use, zoom ring is a little stiff between 200-300mm but I guess this will probably loosen.
-- focus, I can't really see much difference here as both the sigma and tamron can hunt a bit at the long end.
-- Purple, the Tamron shows lots of purple in certain situations although not bad below 200mm, I haven't seen any from the sigma so far.
To be quite honest I'm a little torn now though. The Tamron does seem to produce the sharper images but I'm much more impressed by the colour/contrast and lack of purple with the Sigma - I definitely prefer the "look" of the sigma images, the colours on my Tamron just seem "muddy" in comparison.
Unfortunately I still can't 100% decide, I'll have to try more shots !!
simon
Comment by simonkit posted on Sigma vs Tamron 70-300 - First impression at 06/04/2008 - 18:13
Received my Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro today & have tried a few shots to compare it against the Tamron LD DI equivalent I already own. First impressions...
The sigma is slightly lighter/smaller - not a great difference though
From the manufacturers' websites:
Sigma: 76.6 x 122mm, 550g
Tamron: 76.6 x 116.5mm, 435g
.
Just checking them again now, yes the Tamron is probably slightly lighter - although on paper it looks a big difference comparing them "inhand" is difficult to feel much difference. This probably accounts for my thoughts on build quality too.
Comment by simonkit posted on Sigma vs Tamron 70-300 - First impression at 04/04/2008 - 12:24
The sigma is slightly lighter/smaller - not a great difference though
Sigma uses 58mm filter, Tamron 62mm
Build quality - the Sigma feels better, less "plasticy" somehow
IQ, early days yet however..
I'm impressed by colour/contrast that the Sigma produces, nicer than my Tamron - the sigma also underexposes less than the Tamron, probably about 1/2 stop.
Sharpness seems quite comparable, taken several shots at 300mm and both are decent. I actually find the Sigma very good at F5.6/300mm.
Here are a few macro shots taken at 300mm (all slightly cropped) - not exactly a scientific test but my initial impressions are very positive on the Sigma, I think I'll be selling the Tamron although I need to do a bit more comparison to be 100% sure.
Simon
Tamron - F5.6 / 300mm Macro

Sigma - F5.6 / 300mm Macro

Tamron - F11 / 300mm Macro

Sigma - F11 / 300mm Macro

Comment by simonkit posted on Sigma vs Tamron 70-300 - First impression at 04/04/2008 - 11:52
thanks
simon
Comment by simonkit posted on VEHO 8gb SDHC card ? at 02/04/2008 - 22:40
Anyone used these or heard any reports etc ?
http://www.ebuyer.com/product/136210
Thanks
simon
Comment by simonkit posted on VEHO 8gb SDHC card ? at 02/04/2008 - 18:41
simon
Comment by simonkit posted on New Walkabout lens recommendation at 01/04/2008 - 19:24


At F11/F16 differences are harder to notice, infact the Sigma is perhaps ever so slightly sharper but it's very slight.
It also looks like my Tamron could have slight de-centering issues - the R/h side doesn't look as good as the left
simon