shanegeach

Joined: 9th September 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

shanegeach
hey everyone happy new year, its been a while since i been on here. I'm building up my kit as well as a site.

I just bought a lens and wanted to find out if this is a decent lens for the price i paid.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280442998739&ssPageName=STR...

please can anyone with some knowledge, let me know what they think ta,

Comment by shanegeach posted on SMC Pentax A 50mm 1.7 prime lens at 05/01/2010 - 20:07

shanegeach
i got the lens and extension tubes apparantley it is 15 years old, in digital its 180mm and its true macro, will be getting addapter first thing in the morning if royal mail pull their fingers out......... and i'll upload a test image for you all.....

Comment by shanegeach posted on Macro lens..... at 03/12/2009 - 00:56

shanegeach
im trading in my mz50 and 28-80 and then paying the balance, seeing as both didnt cost a penny. so far with my new lens it proves to be good, i dont need the other two mentioned and it just means lugging them around, plus i have 3 other cameras so i wont miss them.....

Comment by shanegeach posted on Macro lens..... at 01/12/2009 - 20:37

shanegeach
Hey all, questions about a lens again..... Sirius M42 Screw lens 135mm f2.8 macro Mint......£39.

This is what i want to buy and add to my small collection, i have ordered the adapter from srb-griturn, and want to know if this is a good one to have or not ????? There is no picture on the site, I have seen it and held it, there are no marks on it nor are there any on the optics, its clean.......

Any ideas or what ever you can think of for this will be appreciated.

P.S I have uploaded a test image i took with my new 18-55 kit lens if anyone fancies a nose at and possibly some CC and tips......

Comment by shanegeach posted on Macro lens..... at 30/11/2009 - 22:03

shanegeach
RR wrote:
shanegeach wrote:
Oggy wrote:
Looks like a promising start. One thought though, not lens related. If the exif data is correct you took that shot at ISO 200 at 1/4000th. Personally I'd have dropped down to ISO 100 as with a subject like that you do not need the speed.
if i could i would of but my ist ds only starts from iso 200 and ends at 3200, i just wish pentax would bring their iso down to 50 or 64 like most other cameras, my fuji starts at 64 then goes right up to 6400.
Yeah but your Hasselblad only goes up to iso 800
Thats the down side to it but by god it doesnt half produce some outstanding images, if i can i will post one in my gallery tomorrow morning sometime, it's a pity we cant upload more than 1 image, how do i post a pic in the forum threads like everyone else has done then i can show you one of my best ones ?????

Comment by shanegeach posted on Pentax SMC 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SMC P-DA AL Lens at 28/11/2009 - 23:07

shanegeach
Oggy wrote:
Looks like a promising start. One thought though, not lens related. If the exif data is correct you took that shot at ISO 200 at 1/4000th. Personally I'd have dropped down to ISO 100 as with a subject like that you do not need the speed.
if i could i would of but my ist ds only starts from iso 200 and ends at 3200, i just wish pentax would bring their iso down to 50 or 64 like most other cameras, my fuji starts at 64 then goes right up to 6400.

Comment by shanegeach posted on Pentax SMC 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SMC P-DA AL Lens at 28/11/2009 - 21:17

shanegeach
Oggy wrote:
There are all sorts of scientific tests you can do, but my suggestion would be to get out there and take some pictures with it.
Tried it this morning on my way to work and it seems to work netter than my other two...... it's in my gallery if you want to have a look

Comment by shanegeach posted on Pentax SMC 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SMC P-DA AL Lens at 28/11/2009 - 20:18

shanegeach
just a quick question, what would be the best way to test a lens ????

Comment by shanegeach posted on Pentax SMC 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SMC P-DA AL Lens at 28/11/2009 - 20:09

shanegeach
thoughton wrote:
For what it's worth I lost the hood from my 18-55 in the first week I had the camera while walking around on Maiden Castle. The bayonet fitting is extremely loose and flimsy in my opinion. I never replaced it and happily used the lens for another 2 years without noticing any problems from going hoodless.
Hoodless, sounds rude...... sorry. In all fairness i'll need it for summer time only for winter i not too bothered. As summer got outdoor wedding, so it'll be a just incase thing to have.....

Comment by shanegeach posted on Pentax SMC 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SMC P-DA AL Lens at 27/11/2009 - 13:55

shanegeach
Anvh wrote:
You mean this one? link
That's the DA L version, optics are the same but it does not have a hood, Quick-Shift and a metal lens mount.
yup that one, im on a tight budget as well as having to buy xmas stuff for my two girls........

Comment by shanegeach posted on Pentax SMC 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SMC P-DA AL Lens at 27/11/2009 - 13:53

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo