sazanovich

Joined: 9th January 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

sazanovich
petrochemist wrote:


(Yes I'm also involved in optics & Science)

Mike
One more! Nice!

And thanks for the advice of cleaning silver mirrors! Once I damaged an old silver-coated mirror with a lens tissue, was not careful enough.

Igor

Comment by sazanovich posted on Lens cleaning paper - thoughts? at 13/01/2011 - 21:14

sazanovich
ManixZero wrote:
In my work I have regularly clean the very exotic optics optics of a range extremely expensive excimer lasers. To improve efficiency.

Hi MZ!
Glad to know there is someone else here dealing with optics+science!

Igor

Comment by sazanovich posted on Lens cleaning paper - thoughts? at 12/01/2011 - 13:16

sazanovich
davex wrote:
Strongly recommend these
The size of face flannels, well worth 2 quid.

Davex.
Looks like kitchen towel to me :O
I would probably be scared ti try these... If they say they use it for car cleaning - I would not try it on MY optics

I got one from jessops some time ago wich looks more appropriate, but use it mainly for camera LCD cleaning; To clean optics, I use optics cleaning tissues http://www.thorlabs.com/thorProduct.cfm?partNumber=MC-5 with a drop of pure (99.99%) ethanol, and taking care not to touch lens mount not to spread dust from the mount edge onto the lens. Mostly just touch the lens with the tissue corner (wet in ethanol) and gently drag-lift it away.

Comment by sazanovich posted on Lens cleaning paper - thoughts? at 10/01/2011 - 20:58

sazanovich
i-Berg wrote:
A good purchase, nice camera

Did you check to ensure it has current firmware installed while you're at it?
Hi i-Berg,
No I haven't yet. Still learning it

Comment by sazanovich posted on K-x owners please help - "shake reduction" issue at 10/01/2011 - 20:47

sazanovich
Steve Chasey wrote:
My Sigma 135-400mm developed a similar fault - even when in A, camera unable to control aperture. Lens hadn't been dropped or ill treated - just developed a fault.

Repaired by Sigma for just under £60 inc P&P, VAT etc. Postage cost me a shade over £20 (first class recorded next day delivery, £400 insured value).

HTH


Steve
When that fault happened did it still work with your camera in the opposite setting of aperture ring? Mine works when the aperture ring is set as it should not be
Mine cost me £108 including delivery - so do not think I want to spend £80 to get it set properly by Sigma
I've just seen the new one like that for £170 on ebay...

Comment by sazanovich posted on Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 DG Macro - aperture ring settting issue at 09/01/2011 - 23:21

sazanovich
bretti_kivi wrote:
contact problem, maybe?
Seems unlikely - why then it works in the opposite setting (in which it should not ).
Unless someone got with his hands inside it and mis-wired contacts when assembling back Joking D) Do not know to be honest what could it be.

Comment by sazanovich posted on Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 DG Macro - aperture ring settting issue at 09/01/2011 - 23:15

sazanovich
Mike-P wrote:

In that case .. all is not well.
Contact the seller to arrange return (or substantial discount)
I'm not sure I'll do it I've just seen them today - nice couple of respectable age, they've driven down to Sheffield from another town to help me out with that. I realised they had used it in this way all the time without bothering about how it should be )) So I don't really feel to hassle them again. In fact the lens works, but the thing which bothers me - was that consequence of some drop, or unprofessional repair, or is it a manufacturer fault - are there any more such lenses doing same thing?
Igor

Comment by sazanovich posted on Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 DG Macro - aperture ring settting issue at 09/01/2011 - 21:34

sazanovich
Mike-P wrote:
Suppose it depends which way you are holding the lens.

As long as it is set to the A position and you don't get the blinking F then all is well.
The direction - when it is attached to the camera and lens is looking forward;
The case is that it communicates with the camera when the ring is not set to "A", and it is not recognised when I set-lock the ring to "A", that's the point.
Cheers, Igor

Comment by sazanovich posted on Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 DG Macro - aperture ring settting issue at 09/01/2011 - 21:21

sazanovich
Mike-P wrote:


First rule of fight club ... sorry, photography.

If you buy a used camera always reset it to default settings before anything else.
Good point, Mike, thanks. I need to do it indeed.

Comment by sazanovich posted on K-x owners please help - "shake reduction" issue at 09/01/2011 - 20:35

sazanovich
Hi folks, putting second separate post for a day I've got a lens in the subject on ebay, all looks fine, however the aperture ring is doing a bit funny things. In the user's guide they say, to have it recognized by the camera I need to set the aperture ring onto "A" after lock; which in fact means to twist the aperture ring as far as possible to the right, then press lock button and move a bit more to the right. However in my lens I need to twist the ring as far to the left as I can, only then camera can control it. If I do as they say in the manual - I will get blinking "F---" Has anybody seen anything like that? Cheers, Igor

Comment by sazanovich posted on Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-6.3 DG Macro - aperture ring settting issue at 09/01/2011 - 20:31

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo