Sandehalynch

Joined: 15th January 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Sandehalynch
[IMG]http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a119/Sandeha/th_IMGP3615.jpg[/IMG]

http://www.blurb.com/my/book/detail/2089642

"Three Cities" contains 63 images shot on or just off the street in Singapore, Bologna and Montevideo. All of the photographs in the book were taken using black and white negative film and were shot with a Pentax 35mm SLR or a Rolleiflex TLR between 2003 and 2010. The book is in 8"x10" landscape format (soft or hardcover) printed on Premium Matte paper.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on Photobook Just Out - Three Cities: streets in black and white at 07/04/2011 - 21:23

Sandehalynch
Just make sure it goes in your hand luggage, not in the hold. Modern airport scanning gear will probably give a lower radiation dose than your film will get from spending six hours at 35,000 feet.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on film when travelling? at 01/04/2011 - 19:09

Sandehalynch
chaude wrote:
sorry, might just be me being thick, but I think I need something simpler, like there are loads of different types of just fuji and kodak film and i can't even tell the difference between fuji reala/professional/superia, of course there is the price difference but what does it do to the image etc??
Main reason for me using film is for when I'm in the hills (climbing, on more or less vertical ground when I'll be bashing myself around with the camera, so I won't have to worry about a hefty repair if I crack a lens/break/drop a camera as I'll probably bring the cheapest things along.) On less worrying ground I'll normally stick with the K5. Or else a film camera will be my backup when I'm travelling.
You'll need to read between the lines a bit when comparing the marketing blurbs, but some films are designed to give improved results for portraits since it can be dfficult to pull off good skin tones in high/low contrast and flash lighting. Otherwise the film is probably good for landscapes, etc, or might be a good compromise for all-round use.

Sometimes it's down to taste, but if you want the most faithful colour reproduction and negs that will last for fifty years then pay for the best fresh film available. If you want funky colours then out-of-date, cheapo emulsions can be great.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on Difference between films? at 14/03/2011 - 07:18

Sandehalynch
Get a couple of close up lenses or tubes for your 31mm to satisfy your macro needs.

And just wait till you can afford a 15mm.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on Should I sell my FA31LTD for 35 ltd macro and 15ltd? at 10/03/2011 - 08:11

Sandehalynch
I own two zooms, a 19-35mm and an 80-320mm. They're so slow they never even get out of the drawer !!

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on Zooms or Primes at 06/03/2011 - 21:10

Sandehalynch
From what I've read Weil's disease and salmonella, etc, pose a far greater danger than asbestos in Urbex. You could inhale asbestos dust from a place where there is asbestos, but there's a list of deadly bacterial infections that might be picked up anywhere that rats and pigeons wander.

Basic precautions should be enough to keep the average fit person safe, but the risks are there.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on Urban Exploration - Urbex at 03/03/2011 - 17:42

Sandehalynch
The only items that would interest me in a list like this one are:

Pentax SMC F 50mm 1.7
Tamron AF SP Di 90mm 2.8
Pentax AFA 1.7 TC

I'd sell the rest and buy any other Pentax primes.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on What lenses to keep and what to get rid of and what new lens should I buy? at 28/02/2011 - 19:28

Sandehalynch
My first slr was a Kowa 35mm that lasted all of two years before it fatally jammed. But my first wife owned an SP1000 and from there on things started to get serious.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on My First SLR at 14/02/2011 - 21:07

Sandehalynch
It's a very personal thing, of course, and there are space and weight factors to take into account when flying, but are you expecting your style to change when you travel? And if not, why change a lens line-up if you know that it works for you? Last trip abroad (apart from a TLR) I carried three primes for a 35mm camera and a DSLR - that gave me six focal lengths. But then that's what I usually carry on any trip out.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on considering selling the Da 17-70 at 13/02/2011 - 16:46

Sandehalynch
I have a brace of MZ-5n. Very worthy camera, and cheap now. I bought an MZ-5 shortly after it first came out and that cost me £500 or more in 1997. You can pick up good ones for less than £30 these days.

If you didn't want AF then I'd recommend a well-serviced MX or even an LX if you could run to that.

Comment by Sandehalynch posted on what film camera to get?? at 13/02/2011 - 13:00

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo