All Forum Comments
Comment by RR posted on faster lens at 26/04/2010 - 23:54
There is that cheap Falcon 85/f1.4 lens that RR has. Sounds like good value but at 1.4 the DOF is measured in cm.
Comment by RR posted on faster lens at 26/04/2010 - 20:36
I was mainly worried about the power aspect, but this kit seems powerful enough for a domestic situation.
Comment by RR posted on Budget studio flash guidance needed. at 24/04/2010 - 23:05
I was thinking of getting a few manual speedlights & stands/modifiers to create a totally portable kit, but the extras are really quite expensive so thought I'd be better off with a starter studio kit instead.
Are the figures you quoted at iso 100 ? As my native iso is iso 200 anyway & is usable at least 4 stops higher do you think 2 150w/s heads would be enough to light a group of 4 in a slightly larger space ?
It seems you've provided a concise answer & scared off the others, surely someone will have experience good or bad with budget studio kit ?
Comment by RR posted on Budget studio flash guidance needed. at 24/04/2010 - 01:30
I have a baby on the way so that is the primary reasoning for me to pick up some lighting for home portraits. I think a 2 head kit would be fine for starters, I could always use a speedlight or 2 for any key lighting & could pick up a 3rd used head if I needed it to blow out a background.
It'd primarily be used at home & I don't have a large space available so I'm wondering if something like the Interfit ex150 kit would be powerful enough. It would be nice to have enough power to light a group of 4 or 5 people if called upon though, would bumping up the iso enable that or would the light not carry far enough ?
There are some comprehensive looking budget kits on ebay but I'm more wary about the supposed power output claims rather than build quality as I don't need anything too robust.
Any suggestions ? Or have you spotted any great deals for me ?
Thanks, Bob
Comment by RR posted on Budget studio flash guidance needed. at 23/04/2010 - 17:57
Comment by RR posted on Hsm V Non hsm at 18/04/2010 - 12:38
It is heavier though, plus you already have in-body stabilisation so I can't see it being a worthwile upgrade just for the HSM.
Comment by RR posted on Hsm V Non hsm at 18/04/2010 - 10:23
Camera Raw 6 is a whole new step forward though, my first impressions are that it is far more controllable & refined than previous incarnations.
I recently tried a shot at iso 12,800 & processed through Camera Raw 6 & a touch of Dfine 2.0 also. I can't display it here as it isn't a Pentax shot, but you can follow this link.
Comment by RR posted on Noise Ninja at 18/04/2010 - 10:16
For example, the 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM does not have HSM in Pentax or Sony mounts, likewise the 30mm f1.4, 180mm f/3.5 etc.
Check out the lens you are interested in Here and it will tell you at the bottom right of each lens page whether it is HSM in Pentax mount or not.
P.S. - welcome to the forum.
Comment by RR posted on Pentax K10D and Sigma HSM Lense compatibility at 17/04/2010 - 10:24


I'm not sure how well metering works on Pentax bodies, maybe Mike-P can answer that as he had one briefly, I believe he bought it off Robin who would also be able to help if he drops in on this thread.
Samyangs new 14mm also looks value for money if you're not too concerned about barrel distortion. link
(edited to add link)