rparmar

Joined: 23rd February 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

rparmar
beakynet wrote:
Alternatively the little £200 optional optical viewfinder that is suited to just the standard lens is such a great idea!
Say what now? £200 for a framing device?!

Comment by rparmar posted on Using Screens in Various Lighting at 29/03/2012 - 13:18

rparmar
johnriley wrote:
I'm sure we all do what suits us, but it's not the only way.
Care to expand on that? What are your preferences and why?

Comment by rparmar posted on Got me a K10d!!!! at 29/03/2012 - 13:14

rparmar
Since this discussion has become all serious...

I don't think anyone could reasonably argue that adding the requirement of pushing a button painted green is going to make anyone a better photographer. In fact, the only reason that button is there is because Pentax "forgot" the aperture lever, which is why it's referred to as the "crippled" mount.

My preferred way of shooting is with an aperture dial on the lens and manual focus. This is not so much because it slows me down as because it speeds me up! The ergonomics are better and I don't have to keep second-guessing automated systems in the computer they now call a camera. I change the aperture after considering the light and my required depth of field; it's part of a contemplative decision-making process.

The second part of the process is precise focus and framing, plus waiting for the right moment. All I need here is a shutter button.

Decoupling these two related and integral acts in this way is the most comfortable for me to achieve decent results from the photographic process.

But the green button is just freaking annoying, especially as the metering is always off and, worse, inconsistent. When using Pentax I require an "A" position on the aperture dial. When using Olympus PEN, not so.

Comment by rparmar posted on Got me a K10d!!!! at 29/03/2012 - 12:54

rparmar
Smeggypants wrote:
I can't understand the need to take less gear on shooting trips to exotic places than you would take on a shooting trip to a run of the mill location in the UK.
Exactly. I don't pack more than three lenses when walking around town either. Not sure which part of this logic is "strange".

Comment by rparmar posted on what would you take to travel light at 29/03/2012 - 12:47

rparmar
Some random tips.

I keep bubble wrap in my bag to cushion lenses. Less bulk, more versatile and lighter than a dedicated bag of any description.

Always have more memory cards than you think you'll need and put them in different places (camera bag, jacket pocket) so no matter what you forget you always have one to spare.

Bring the small recharger and make sure you have the correct plug ends for the countries you are visiting. I find I only need two batteries since I can recharge them each night.

Carry a lens pen for cleanups in the field.

Remember you are there to experience and enjoy, not just snap. This goes double when travelling with family. Your camera should come second, not first. (Though you can sneak out on dedicated photographic excursions when others are sleeping, shopping, or busy in a museum.)

Comment by rparmar posted on what would you take to travel light at 28/03/2012 - 18:05

rparmar
Depends on what you have. My kit used to be the Pentax K20D, DA12-24 and FA77. Now it would be the Olympus E-PL2, Panasonic 14mm and G. Zuiko 40mm. Travelling light is definitely more fun!

Comment by rparmar posted on what would you take to travel light at 28/03/2012 - 15:30

rparmar
As much as I like manual focus, I do prefer automatic metering since it simply saves time. But there's nothing wrong with the old stop-down route so long as you can always take your time to get a shot. Maybe you can upgrade to a fully working K10D down the line.

P.S. How's life in the Wirral these days? Been more than 15 years since I've been there to visit my relatives.

Comment by rparmar posted on Got me a K10d!!!! at 28/03/2012 - 15:27

rparmar
It's always been the case that PhotoShop upgrades provide only incremental improvements for a lot of money. I can't think of any update that was ever essential.

Smeggypants wrote:
Lightroom and Nik Software plugins are more than enough for 99.9999% of photography purposes.
Dead right.

Comment by rparmar posted on The New Photoshop CS6 at 28/03/2012 - 15:24

rparmar
Dave_Evanson wrote:
I have never tried it but… could you use the sensor shift feature of the K5 (or K7) to achieve the same effect as a tilt &shift lens? (well the shift part anyway).
The deviation is far too small.

Comment by rparmar posted on Architectural lens / Perspective control lens at 28/03/2012 - 15:02

rparmar
I find screens usable for shooting only in ideal situations. And even then they are far from ideal. Every decent camera needs a viewfinder. Not just for visibility but for stability, and this is something that does not vary with eyesight.

Comment by rparmar posted on Using Screens in Various Lighting at 27/03/2012 - 14:44

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo