All Forum Comments
Comment by RichardDay posted on Pentax X70 at 01/05/2009 - 11:32
Hi Richard
Could you try to make some low light pictures. I would be using this for concerts only.
As I have theFA*28-70mm it could complement it perfectly, I'd just have to sell my 50-135mm and get a 12-28 f2.8.
- Eerr What?
- SUch thing as a 12-28mm f2.8 does not exist...
- What????
Thanks
I've trawled through my collection and the only low light shot taken wide open was of our old cat Jasmine below. Taken at ISO 1600, 1/30th sec at f2.8. The lens has no problems focussing in low light as it has excellent contrast thereby allowing the AF to lock easily and quickly.

Comment by RichardDay posted on Tamron 70-200 f2.8 Di and Tamron 1.4x AF TC at 01/05/2009 - 10:25
I shall put it up with photos on the Classified section later today.
Comment by RichardDay posted on Should I go for the GX10? at 30/04/2009 - 10:50
Mine's arrived!
Very quick tests show
(i) it is sharp @250mm 4.0
(ii) it does not appear to vignette at any focal length on film bodies (at least based on the viefineder view)
(iii) My K10D has slight back focus issues (something I have only suspected so far) - Roll on the new body (or should I get a K20D now they can be had for silly money...)
My photography would have to be much more serious for me to spend more than £600 on a new body. I blew £200 over my single item limit when I bought the DA*60-250, but I'd been waiting for that lens for 3 years!
I now have to sell my 6 week old Tamron 70-200 f2.8 link which I bought because I really had given up on the 60-250 appearing in time (or ever! :roll for this years telephoto shooting season (wildlife and air shows) . I will probably have to sell my backup body (K10D) as well as several other items I don't use much these days, to help redress the photo cash balance!
Comment by RichardDay posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 30/04/2009 - 10:44
Something I have just noticed. When turning the zoom ring from about "235" mm to 250 mm , I can see very minimal movement on the zoom extension, but it does move. However, through the viewfinder, there appears to be no change in zoom length this final bit !
Anyone else confirm what they see ?
At close object distances (2m) there is virtually no noticeable change.
Comment by RichardDay posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 28/04/2009 - 08:32
Something I have just noticed. When turning the zoom ring from about "235" mm to 250 mm , I can see very minimal movement on the zoom extension, but it does move. However, through the viewfinder, there appears to be no change in zoom length this final bit !
Anyone else confirm what they see ?
DA 55-300 @ 210mm

DA*60-250 @ 250mm

DA 55-300 @ 260mm

DA 55-300 @ 300mm

From the above, it would seem that the 250 setting is about right. Not conclusive of course, but reasonable. Only an accurate angular measurement would be specific.
Comment by RichardDay posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 28/04/2009 - 08:19
Just found out that it works really well with my new DA*60-250, although it wouldn't lock with earlier versions of the DA*16-50 or 50-135!
Maybe I should have kept it!
Comment by RichardDay posted on Tamron 70-200 f2.8 Di and Tamron 1.4x AF TC at 27/04/2009 - 17:55
Richard, I'd appreciate an opinion of the IQ difference between your Tamron 70-200 1:2.8 and your newly acquired DA*60-250 1:4.
I also went for the DA*60-250 1:4but I would have preferred a 1:2.8 for indoor horse event photography where the use of flash is not permissible.
The only comparison I have is between my DA* 50-135 1:2.8 on my K20D and the Canon 70-200L 1:2.8 on my son's 30D. Both compare favourably but of course the 70-200L has that bit more reach.
Time will tell if the limitation of f4 is indeed a limitation.
I would give both lenses very similar marks out of 10, for me it's 8.5/10 for the Tamron and 9/10 for the Pentax, for others it would be reversed.
Another very important issue for many these days is cost, The Tamron is around £250 less than the Pentax using SRS prices, £649 v. £899 (£799 was for his first delivery only, probably all sold by now). I wouldn't be surprised to see that price gap to widen again during the summer.
In fact, if the 60-250 hadn't been equal to the Tamron wide open at f4.0, I wouldn't have bought it, even at £799, £899 would make it even less likely.
I've done an exhaustive test between the 55-300, 60-250 and Tamron and posted (in multiple posts) on DePressing Review. It's too much content to repost it all here, I suggest that you take a look at my original post as well a the 7 follow up posts, so here is the link to the comparative test #1. link
Comment by RichardDay posted on Tamron 70-200 f2.8 Di and Tamron 1.4x AF TC at 27/04/2009 - 10:48
Black..... Silver..... and now Rouge
shim
Comment by RichardDay posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 25/04/2009 - 20:59

Decided to sell my 6 week old 70-200 f2.8 Di and the superb Tamron 1.4x AF TC. I've decided to stick with all Pentax glass for various reasons (I won't bore you!)
Sample images and test shots available on my Flickr site: link
70-200 Di - £525 with free UK shipping - as new, all original boxes etc.
1.4x AF TC - £100 with free UK shipping - mint/as new (original box, paperwork etc).
Paypal, or less 5% with cleared funds (cheque, cash, transfer etc.)
Comment by RichardDay posted on Tamron 70-200 f2.8 Di and Tamron 1.4x AF TC at 25/04/2009 - 11:38


Has anyone got their hands on the X70 yet?
Thinking of updating my old FZ8 Panasonic and going all Pentax with the X70. Just that nagging feeling i should be looking at the old master....the FZ28!
Russ