All Forum Comments
Comment by Photoaddict posted on DSLR Magazine at 30/05/2011 - 12:02
It probably is cheaper overall, But I just wanted to provide some food for thought.
Comment by Photoaddict posted on Film Versus Digital at 25/05/2011 - 13:16
The point I would like to make is that we are all updating our cameras far more frequently than when we were using film cameras.
I bought a Pentax MX in 1977, adding a Super A ten years later, followed fourteen years later (because I felt I needed autofocus) by a MZ5N.
All of these are fine cameras, still in use, but not often, I have to admit. Given the same lens, as long as the shutter speeds and metering were accurate, they all produced identical image quality. Even the top of the range LX would have the same IQ.
Someone (and they were many) buying a ME Super back in 1980, would not even think about updating. What was the point?
I would guess that most people buying one of 1stD series would now have updated, probably more than once.So, although we no longer have to pay for film, the cost of our photography is probably higher, due to the considerable amount of money we have to shelve out to keep our cameras up to date. And, unlike film cameras, most improved features do make a difference. More pixels, better sensors, bigger rear screens, video etc.
And what about trying to convince the wife that you really do need a new camera? Surely dear, she will say, your present camera takes good photos. Why do you need a new one?
Very hard to explain to someone who thinks a camera is a camera, full stop! She's probably right, but we just cannot resist the latest, improved models. What will we be using in twenty five years time? The mind boggles.
And then, if you use a compact as well......?
I know we are all enjoying our photography more than ever, but don't run away with the idea that it is cheaper.
Comment by Photoaddict posted on Film Versus Digital at 25/05/2011 - 12:57
MX,SuperA,MZ5N,DL2,Assorted Pentax Lenses.
Comment by Photoaddict posted on K7 poor image quality at 24/11/2010 - 12:20
MX,SuperA,MZ5N,Assorted Pentax lenses.
Comment by Photoaddict posted on K7 poor image quality at 24/11/2010 - 12:08
This is a terrific bargain as this item sells in excess of £250.00 at SRS and Park Cameras.If you need one - buy it! It may not be on offer for long. It is also included as a bung with Pentax KX at same store.
Comment by Photoaddict posted on Flash Bargain at 24/10/2010 - 12:23
The camera is still showing full charge,and has been used a lot.Haven't even charged them yet. Use a sanyo recharger,giving a ten hour charge,and then forget them.Can't think why I never tried them before.
Comment by Photoaddict posted on WANT TO REPLACED DEAD BATTERIES at 09/08/2010 - 11:15


On reading through it, I honestly thought it was an advertisment for Nikon and Canon Cameras.
Not one mention of Pentax or Sony. Isn't this taking brand bias a bit too far?