philstaff

Joined: 27th April 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

philstaff
fritzthedog wrote:
Anvh wrote:
snappychappy wrote:
Isn't a zoom covering a range of over 200mm in it's range a superzoom?
We are talking about zoom here so i guessed the range of zoom rather then the focal length.

So 70-300 is a 4,2x zoom 55-300 = 5,5x but for example a 18-250 which is certainly a super zoom we are talking about 13,8x
Does it really matter? I think we know what Ian was asking - or have I got it wrong Ian?
No not at all Carl let me clarify what Im asking is what lens would members recomend to get the shots I missed with the 70/300 not being able to cover the range needed. Lets not get boged down in technical jargon.

Comment by philstaff posted on Super zooms at 07/08/2011 - 21:40

philstaff
I took these photos with the Tamron 70/300 lens on the Kr recently. Over the course of the day I found the lens falling short of the focal length to get some shots that would have been nice. Considering this and the ability for a new lens to deliver a good IQ can I ask what members choices would for a puurchase of a new lens in this situation. I have to say though in my estimation the Tamron does not do a bad job some may differ in opinion.
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/pic3-3.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/IMGP6243.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/IMGP5868.jpg[/IMG]
Regards Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Super zooms at 07/08/2011 - 17:52

philstaff
These look great the cols are realy punchy and the detail very good are they all took with the same lens ?.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on I kept my istD...its CCD. at 06/08/2011 - 17:43

philstaff
Cracking set of photos the lens looks to work very well on the Kr. I would love a quality zoom like this but just cant justify the expence at the moment.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Sunderland-2 at 05/08/2011 - 22:00

philstaff
Thanks John came in the post today and as in new condition.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on FS: Hoya Circular Polarising Filters (UNOPENED) at 04/08/2011 - 14:20

philstaff
Why not consider a mf lens I would imagine you could pick both a 50 1.7 and a 35mm lens for less than £80.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Help with choosing a lens - looking at 50mm f1.4 at 03/08/2011 - 21:52

philstaff
Well I have tried on the camera a few lenses now and as far as I can see they all seem to work well at this point in time. Since the calaberation my camera is producing much better photos.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Calabration at 03/08/2011 - 21:47

philstaff
http://www.aldi.co.uk/uk/html/offers/special_buys3_19382.htm

I bought one of these 2 weeks ago and suits me may be worth your while checking it out.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Cheap Tripod? at 01/08/2011 - 22:57

philstaff
Just had my Kr returnd to me from Johnstons they have calabraited the af and up graded the firmware. My question is will the af need checking again at some point in time.
Regards Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on Calabration at 01/08/2011 - 22:48

philstaff
Blaze wrote:
It looks as if the Pentax is the one to go for since nearly all of you sing its praises and is about what I had hoped to pay. It sounds ideal in all ways - and should be a good lens to learn with.

Does anyone want to buy an old Tamron SP 70-210 ?????

Just crossed : Paris is easy to get to from where we are.
YOu don't happen to want to sell your 55-300, Carl ?
Keep an eye on the classified section of the forum you may see something that suits you and save a pound or two good luck with your choice.
Ian

Comment by philstaff posted on TAMRON 18-200mm 3,5-6,3 XR Di II Pentax at 01/08/2011 - 22:26

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo