All Forum Comments
Comment by philstaff posted on Loch An Ruathair at 27/08/2011 - 22:34
Assuming you're going to occasionally want to print A3-A2, I think 10mp is about the minimum for best results. Anything over that will be fine, the pixel count is actually not that relevant. For example the K5 manages to have better IQ than previous 10, 12, and 14mp models, despite having extra megapixels. The number of megapixels isn't going to reduce IQ per se, because the increase in pixel count comes hand in hand with other technical advancements.
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on The pixel war at 27/08/2011 - 22:29
[quote:3496ace15f="Mike-P"]I still think my K10D produced slightly sharper results than the K20D/K-7/K-5.
For me it's a trade off against being able to crop a lot more, especially when shooting aircraft/birds etc.
Mike, I wonder whether this is due solely to the change in sensor to CMOS??
Regards
Chris
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on The pixel war at 27/08/2011 - 22:27
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on The pixel war at 27/08/2011 - 22:08
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on The pixel war at 27/08/2011 - 11:34
I have tested the K-r and I think if you are reaching this conclusion then there is probably a fault. I would keep a K-r over the K10D without any hesitation, so maybe trying another one would be a good idea?
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on From a K10 to a KR ? at 25/08/2011 - 16:25
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on just dropping in at 25/08/2011 - 13:26
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/sony_cybershot_dsc_hx100v_review/
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on Back-up to a K5 : Pentax or Nex ? at 20/08/2011 - 16:00
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on Steam Trains in IR at 19/08/2011 - 22:30
I thought this page might be of interest to some members.
Ian
Comment by philstaff posted on Some oldies at 19/08/2011 - 22:25


Ian