PG

Joined: 9th February 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

PG
That's one thing that I've noticed with the Pentax K-7, coming from a Canon 40D and 50D. The shutter is just so much quieter and more refined, which makes it very useful for me during church ceremonies.

Comment by PG posted on Clunk free shutter from Pentax at 19/02/2010 - 13:29

PG
I'm not sure how useful this is to the majority of us as the Adobe software they have for sale is for students. You'll need to submit your student ID to Adobe before they'll send you a serial number, so it's not like you could easily cheat the system if you wanted to.

Comment by PG posted on Cheap software Photoshop , windows,adobe,etc at 18/02/2010 - 18:01

PG
I've installed it. Don't notice anything different, and it looks like my AF micro adjustments have not been reset.

Comment by PG posted on K7 firmware 1.03 at 18/02/2010 - 13:37

PG
The last time I was in Jessops, I heard one of the sales people trying to push a D700 onto a first time DSLR buyer saying that was what you needed to get good photos. I purposely chuckled and the sales person finally gave in and said you could probably get by with a D300, but it would still be best to have a D700.

Comment by PG posted on Jessops at 18/02/2010 - 07:47

PG
While I agree with the sentiment that we're making a mountain out of a molehill with regards to AF speed, your example isn't helping to settle the argument. The bird looks like its flying across the scene, which isn't going to be as difficult for the AF system to handle since the distance between subject and camera doesn't change as much. If the bird was flying towards or away from the camera, now that's something else.

Comment by PG posted on Lets talk about AF speed at 18/02/2010 - 07:44

PG
It may be clever, it's just not very useful

Comment by PG posted on AP Gives K7 award of Innovation of the Year 2010 at 17/02/2010 - 20:57

PG
There's nothing in the K-7 that I find particularly innovative. What it does represent is excellent value. For the price, you'll struggle to find another kit that provides all the features coupled with the build quality.

Comment by PG posted on AP Gives K7 award of Innovation of the Year 2010 at 17/02/2010 - 17:36

PG
Mike-P wrote:

Is Pentax that big any more?

Considering FF is still a very small part of Canon and Nikons sales and the people buying them are mainly pro photographers for weddings and such I really cannot see Hoya putting the money into full frame.
That's what I meant. Pentax isn't a large company and can't really afford to produce anything too esoteric. Everything they produce needs to be a financial success or they could be in trouble. Like you say, the FF market isn't big and neither is the MF market. In fact, with the introduction of high resolution FF cameras like the Sony A900 and Nikon D3X I would have thought that the demand for MF cameras is on the decline. Why pay £10k for a camera that doesn't do much better than a £1.5k camera?

Comment by PG posted on Here at last: 645D at 17/02/2010 - 17:34

PG
I would have thought that a FF camera would have made more sense than a medium format one, given the size of Pentax (the company + user base). It should be interesting to see how this plays out.

Comment by PG posted on Here at last: 645D at 17/02/2010 - 13:27

PG
I've not had good experience with them. I tried buying a Tokina 16-50mm f/2.8 lens from them a while back. When it turned out that the lens was not in stock (the website said it was) it took them over 2 weeks before I was refunded for the purchase. In fact, as I had paid using Google Checkout I even had to complain to Google before I received my money.

I'd stay away from them if I were you.

Comment by PG posted on Anybody any experience of Simply Electronics? at 16/02/2010 - 18:05

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo