All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Snowdon from The Pinnacles at 09/04/2010 - 23:29
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Just a small 4x4 ......... at 09/04/2010 - 23:17
From what I've seen that's not true, the K200D has better low iso performance than the K7 and the K7 has better low iso performance than the KX and vice versa for high iso.
- Edit - Sorry Stefan, I misread your post!
But the point stands that the extra resolution should result in better IQ at all ISO settings, doesn't it? Unless you are looking at a 100% crop.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K7 Vs Kx? at 09/04/2010 - 23:08
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K7 Vs Kx? at 09/04/2010 - 23:02
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K7 Vs Kx? at 09/04/2010 - 22:39
Edit - Stefan, there we have the answer!
Interestingly the K-x slam-dunks Canon and Nikon 12MP cameras. link
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K7 Vs Kx? at 09/04/2010 - 22:22
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on A cityscape... at 09/04/2010 - 21:15
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Cleaning of kit at 09/04/2010 - 14:50
(1) a 50mm f1.7 SMCM if you don't mind fully manual, or SMCA if you do
(2) a 24mm lens. The most cost-effective 24mm tend to be the Tamron Adaptall f2.5 ones (I have one and I am pleased with it), but the Sigma Ultrawide II is the one to get if you can track one down. Pentax 24mm lenses seem to go for more money that I think they are worth.


Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Walk around lens at 08/04/2010 - 22:04
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Americana at 08/04/2010 - 21:39

