Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
This is a great move, good for us, good for srs, and very good for Pentax! They just need to add the 600mm to the inventory

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on no rent lenses at 01/08/2010 - 12:21

Pentaxophile
dougf8 wrote:
Yes, I'm happier with the Tamron but its another £80 on top of the 16-45. However its 1.375664 times better (seasonally adjusted).
Glad to hear you're getting your money's worth, at least!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 18-55 DA replacement at 31/07/2010 - 16:27

Pentaxophile
Quote:
The market is there, as a great many Pentax DSLR users would like a powerful compact with the Pentax badge on it.
Hmmm.... I don't think I'm one of those photographers, cos if it doesn't have a lens mount, I don't really care what brand it is! The LX3 and G11 look so good, it would be very difficult for Pentax to compete. If Nikon failed, I doubt Pentax would do so well! If I was going to get one of them, I'd go for the LX3 which looks a bit closer to a normal compact.

Don't Olympus have any offerings in the high-end compact category any more? I used to love my c5060...

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on A plea to Pentax at 31/07/2010 - 16:21

Pentaxophile
It's all been said here and on the other thread, so I don't see how continuing this argument is of any use to the OP's question. Let's just accept that some people think the 16-45 is a good value upgrade to the kit lens, and some do not- an opinion which can only really be formed by using both lenses for an extended period, although pixel peeping can be interesting too. But what other options have people tried? I have heard good things about a f2.8 Tamron standard zoom, for example?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 18-55 DA replacement at 31/07/2010 - 11:05

Pentaxophile
The WR (and DA II) version is slightly improved, upon what was already a good little lens.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Telephoto lens - need advice at 30/07/2010 - 23:29

Pentaxophile
If you got a lens twice as good as the £50 kit lens for just £100, how awesome would that be?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 18-55 DA replacement at 29/07/2010 - 23:14

Pentaxophile
Just send Stefan your picture Ken!

Or, if that's a bit too complicated to deal with, don't!

Let's see how this all pans out before drawing any conclusions. If people like it, maybe the website bods can figure a way of making the competition more user friendly.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Voting competition #1 - Cycles at 29/07/2010 - 19:36

Pentaxophile
The kit zoom is a great lens for the money at f8+, but I don't think I had to pixel-peep to notice the improvement with the 16-45 wide-open, and there is far less vignetting too.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 18-55 DA replacement at 28/07/2010 - 21:57

Pentaxophile
MrCynical wrote:
One of the captions interested me: "Experts say Adams' negatives are almost worthless since most of his creativity was down to how he produced photos in the darkroom"


Exactly. This 'Adam Ansells' chap was just a lazy cheat who couldn't take a picture for toffee and had to correct his mistakes in post processing. Not what I would even call photography. Charlatan.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on $45 garage sale purchase worth 200million ! at 28/07/2010 - 21:14

Pentaxophile
I went for the 16-45mm - the cheapest worthwhile upgrade. Very pleased with it too.

Have a look at this: link

Quote:
Verdict
If the 16-50mm was only a £100 more than the 16-45mm it may be worth the money, but this lens is at least £200 more. It’s bulkier to carry around and the close focus capability isn’t as good. What you gain here is the one stop faster aperture, and for those shooting in low light that could be worth the price as increasing ISO on the current models can introduce too much noise. When Pentax produce a camera with superb low noise at ISO800 the advantage will become less advantageous, but until then the 16-50mm’s extra stop may get you out of a hole.
The K-x is just such a camera.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on 18-55 DA replacement at 28/07/2010 - 14:37

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo